3dmarks in WIN 2000 are low
I scored a 5100 with my system in WIN98, so I decided to load 3dmarks2000 and give it a shot while I have WIN2000 loaded. 2848 is what I scored. I went from a 5100 in WIN 98 to a 2848 in WIN2000. Of course every driver on my WIN 2000 is practically beta still.
I scored a 5100 with my system in WIN98, so I decided to load 3dmarks2000 and give it a shot while I have WIN2000 loaded.
2848 is what I scored. I went from a 5100 in WIN 98 to a 2848 in WIN2000.
Of course every driver on my WIN 2000 is practically beta still. To include my ATA 66 drivers. But, I was not expecting such a low score.
Also, the drivers I used are the NVIDIA 3.66 ones as they seem the most stable in WIN2000 at the moment.
Every game still plays smooth and silky though and I guess that is the most important thing.
Maybe the 3dmarks 2000 is not optimized for WIN2000 too?
------------------
PIII650 @ 728
Abit BE6-2
256MB PC 100
3D Prophet SDR 32MB
2848 is what I scored. I went from a 5100 in WIN 98 to a 2848 in WIN2000.
Of course every driver on my WIN 2000 is practically beta still. To include my ATA 66 drivers. But, I was not expecting such a low score.
Also, the drivers I used are the NVIDIA 3.66 ones as they seem the most stable in WIN2000 at the moment.
Every game still plays smooth and silky though and I guess that is the most important thing.
Maybe the 3dmarks 2000 is not optimized for WIN2000 too?
------------------
PIII650 @ 728
Abit BE6-2
256MB PC 100
3D Prophet SDR 32MB
Participate on our website and join the conversation
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.
