98 vs. ME as Second OS

Hello guys and gals! I was wondering if I may be able to get a bit of advice from all the friendly folk out there. I'm going to be installing WinXP Pro onto my box in a few days (after Christmas). But I want to keep a 9x OS around for compatibility purposes (Final Fantasy VII <grin>).

Legacy OS 455 This topic was started by ,


data/avatar/default/avatar22.webp

52 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-08-08
Hello guys and gals!
 
I was wondering if I may be able to get a bit of advice from all the friendly folk out there.
 
I'm going to be installing WinXP Pro onto my box in a few days (after Christmas). But I want to keep a 9x OS around for compatibility purposes (Final Fantasy VII <grin>).
 
I'm going to be using PartitionMagic 7.0 to manage by multiple OSes.
 
So I'd just like to pose the question to all of you: Which would be the better second OS to keep around, 98se or ME?
 
Personally, I've had some bad experiences with Windows ME becoming quite unstable (even to the point of it crashing on its very first boot after install). But I've heard that with proper tweaking, it can become a good OS. Can anyone offer any support or refutation to this?
 
Also, another thing I'd like to know: Does ME provide any bonus, or added features over 98se? Is anything taken away, or lost from 98se?
 
Are there any tweaks that would improve stability or performance on either OS? How about the order I install my drivers, etc. in? Would these things make a big difference, or is that mostly wives' tales and hype that order of install matters?
 
Now, I know that this topic can get quite heated, so I'd like to personally ask everyone to keep this to a cool and reasonable discussion, hehe. Can you guys do that for me...flames scare me
 
Thank you very much, in advance, for your advice, opinions, and help!
 
--Poxnor
 
AMD T-Bird 1.4 GHz (266)
Asus A7M266 Motherboard (AMD Northbridge, Via Southbridge)
256 Megs PC2100 DDR(266) RAM
SBLive 5.1 Dolby Digital
Creative Labs GraphicsBlaster RivaTNT
Plextor PlexWriter 16/10/40A
 
Umm, that's about all the important hardware I can think of, if it matters...drop a line if the hardware of my computer is going to play an important role in the 98se vs. ME debate, and I can post more specifics

Participate on our website and join the conversation

You have already an account on our website? Use the link below to login.
Login
Create a new user account. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds.
Register
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.

Responses to this topic


data/avatar/default/avatar15.webp

1047 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-04-17
Yeah definitely, there is something ODD about ME, sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. I wish I knew why 98 won't run NFS High Stakes for me, its just really strange, but I use XP more now so no biggie, as for my ME install it just sits there for EXTREME cases.

data/avatar/default/avatar32.webp

989 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-08-14
Quote:
as for my ME install it just sits there for EXTREME cases.

That's all my ME install did for the month or two before I upgraded to XP at which point I got rid of it and vowed no 9x OS will ever be installed on my machine and any machine I build in the future.

data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp

148 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-10-25
I would use 98SE in a heartbeat, everyone else has mentioned all the reasons that I hate ME already, so I will same the type.
If you don't want to go either, try Linux or BeOS. BeOS is more or less on the way out, but it was kind of fun at the time.