9x vs 2000Pro vs XP Home - Simulation Benchmarks
This is a discussion about 9x vs 2000Pro vs XP Home - Simulation Benchmarks in the Slack Space category; 9x wins 9x wins! Gonna play all my games in 9x now! ;( Only thing I see wrong with this article is comparing XP Home to 2000 Pro. Where's XP Pro?.
http://www.simhq.com/simhq3/hardware/features/os_shootout/index7.shtml
9x wins 9x wins!
Gonna play all my games in 9x now! ;(
Only thing I see wrong with this article is comparing XP Home to 2000 Pro. Where's XP Pro?
9x wins 9x wins!
Gonna play all my games in 9x now! ;(
Only thing I see wrong with this article is comparing XP Home to 2000 Pro. Where's XP Pro?
Participate in our website and join the conversation
This subject has been archived. New comments and votes cannot be submitted.
Responses to this topic
Heh, 98 won't be the gamers choice for much longer. The memory management issues (and M$ refusal to fix them under its new support policy) in 9x will bite gamers on the *** much sooner than they realise.
Quote:
Heh, 98 won't be the gamers choice for much longer. The memory management issues (and M$ refusal to fix them under its new support policy) in 9x will bite gamers on the *** much sooner than they realise.
Yeah, and it's about time.
9x Sucks
Heh, 98 won't be the gamers choice for much longer. The memory management issues (and M$ refusal to fix them under its new support policy) in 9x will bite gamers on the *** much sooner than they realise.
Yeah, and it's about time.
9x Sucks
Did they benchmark the fact that you have to reboot after switching between games when using Win9x or the fact that games have a tendancy to crash. Then you have to add the fact that I've had friends lose saved games under FAT32. Does a few extra fps justify the use a POS OS like the win9x series?
