9x vs 2000Pro vs XP Home - Simulation Benchmarks
9x wins 9x wins! Gonna play all my games in 9x now! ;( Only thing I see wrong with this article is comparing XP Home to 2000 Pro. Where's XP Pro?.
http://www.simhq.com/simhq3/hardware/features/os_shootout/index7.shtml
9x wins 9x wins!
Gonna play all my games in 9x now! ;(
Only thing I see wrong with this article is comparing XP Home to 2000 Pro. Where's XP Pro?
9x wins 9x wins!
Gonna play all my games in 9x now! ;(
Only thing I see wrong with this article is comparing XP Home to 2000 Pro. Where's XP Pro?
Participate on our website and join the conversation
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.
Responses to this topic
Heh, 98 won't be the gamers choice for much longer. The memory management issues (and M$ refusal to fix them under its new support policy) in 9x will bite gamers on the *** much sooner than they realise.
Did they benchmark the fact that you have to reboot after switching between games when using Win9x or the fact that games have a tendancy to crash. Then you have to add the fact that I've had friends lose saved games under FAT32. Does a few extra fps justify the use a POS OS like the win9x series?
