Athlon XP or Pentium4
Hey everybody, from past experiences and all I would go for the Athlon chips, that's what I currently own, but a lot of my comp nerd friends at CMU are saying that the P4 is the way to go for now with DDR, but I'm like the comp guy too, but seems like don't know what to do now, its a hard choice, cause they seem ve ...
Hey everybody, from past experiences and all I would go for the Athlon chips, that's what I currently own, but a lot of my comp nerd friends at CMU are saying that the P4 is the way to go for now with DDR, but I'm like the comp guy too, but seems like don't know what to do now, its a hard choice, cause they seem very similar, but I'd go for the AthlonXP, what are your deals on these two? Thanx a bunch
Participate on our website and join the conversation
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.
Responses to this topic
Hmm, personally I have PC133 SDRAM, on my computer now, and I've seen a similar system with more ram at DDR, and even then the performance isn't the biggets diff, his comp is 66Mhz faster, yet mine outperforms his, so I do not see the need to pay the HIGH price for RDRAM and get it, I'll stick to DDR RAM, but now the question is, athlon or p4?
I didn't say SDRAM was the same price as RDRAM.
When considering a P4 then SDRAM is NOT an option, so I will not compare apples & pears - they may be the same colour but are vastly different.
Now if I am going to compare like for like I have to choose brand names.
I'll take Crucial as the base for DDR-PC2100 modules.
Also, as RDRAM has to be used in pairs I shall compare like amounts of RAM.
256MB DDR-PC2100, CL 2.5, Unbuffered, Non-Parity £53-09+vat
512MB DDR-PC2100, CL 2.5, Unbuffered, Non-Parity £111.59+vat
Now an equally good name in the RDRAM market is Samsung, I'll just take the vendor where I purchased my P4 parts from, www.komplett.co.uk
Samsung RAMBUS 256MB PC800 Kit (2x 128MB Modules) £68.90+vat
Samsung RAMBUS 512MB PC800 Kit (2x 256MB Modules) £129.35+vat
At 256MB RDRAM is only £15.81 more expensive.
At 512MB RDRAM is £17.76
Sure, in this example Crucial offer free delivery, komplett.co.uk don't, so you've got to add £5.
However as you can see the difference is really nothing considering the outlay on the rest of your system.
I stand by my original statement, there isn't that much difference in price now, so you can make your choice on needs rather than cost.
When considering a P4 then SDRAM is NOT an option, so I will not compare apples & pears - they may be the same colour but are vastly different.
Now if I am going to compare like for like I have to choose brand names.
I'll take Crucial as the base for DDR-PC2100 modules.
Also, as RDRAM has to be used in pairs I shall compare like amounts of RAM.
256MB DDR-PC2100, CL 2.5, Unbuffered, Non-Parity £53-09+vat
512MB DDR-PC2100, CL 2.5, Unbuffered, Non-Parity £111.59+vat
Now an equally good name in the RDRAM market is Samsung, I'll just take the vendor where I purchased my P4 parts from, www.komplett.co.uk
Samsung RAMBUS 256MB PC800 Kit (2x 128MB Modules) £68.90+vat
Samsung RAMBUS 512MB PC800 Kit (2x 256MB Modules) £129.35+vat
At 256MB RDRAM is only £15.81 more expensive.
At 512MB RDRAM is £17.76
Sure, in this example Crucial offer free delivery, komplett.co.uk don't, so you've got to add £5.
However as you can see the difference is really nothing considering the outlay on the rest of your system.
I stand by my original statement, there isn't that much difference in price now, so you can make your choice on needs rather than cost.
I was just reading up on the new dual CPU motherboards coming out for the AMD chips (MPX-based). I thought "well this is cool, full AMD-only chipset so it can't be that bad..", and then I found out that USB is broken. LOL! Nicely done. Now the vendors are shipping PCI USB controllers which now take up one of your "normal" PCI slots, leaving you to hope your stuff works in the 66MHz slots. I read about this on [H]ardOCP and 2CPU. Again, congrats...
My outlook on an amd system is this, good performance with a major sacrifice to stability and compatibility (you know its bad when DELL doesn't even use AMD). Build an Intel system get good performance, stability, and compatibility.
I have to admit, I have a Shuttle AV40(VIA) P4 1.7ghz, and OCZ DDR, and have had no stability problems. This system is equally as stable as my last system which was on the best chipset of all time the 440bx.
I have to admit, I have a Shuttle AV40(VIA) P4 1.7ghz, and OCZ DDR, and have had no stability problems. This system is equally as stable as my last system which was on the best chipset of all time the 440bx.
I got my new board in and its been up and running for 2 days now with no crashes. Its about 20 percent faster in most games and a lot faster copying files.
IF your gonna get an AMD the ABIT KR7A is the way to go.
A note on stability:
If you truly know what you are doing you can make any system stable, almost hehe. I'd have to say tho that both the AMD DDR boards I have used have been ultra stable, moreso then my p3 at work at least. And Dell doesnt use AMD cause he gets too great a pricing from INTEL, he doesnt need to go to AMD. That, like most things, may change. Epecially if there are more shortages of parts in the future.
IF your gonna get an AMD the ABIT KR7A is the way to go.
A note on stability:
If you truly know what you are doing you can make any system stable, almost hehe. I'd have to say tho that both the AMD DDR boards I have used have been ultra stable, moreso then my p3 at work at least. And Dell doesnt use AMD cause he gets too great a pricing from INTEL, he doesnt need to go to AMD. That, like most things, may change. Epecially if there are more shortages of parts in the future.