Bad or good RAM

Hi Group, As I'm about to upgrade my hardware with a completely new motherboard, CPU and RAM, the different prices of RAM has made me wonder weather there's a difference between the producers of RAM.

Windows Hardware 9627 This topic was started by ,


data/avatar/default/avatar33.webp

4 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-10-30
Hi Group,
 
As I'm about to upgrade my hardware with a completely new motherboard, CPU and RAM, the different prices of RAM has made me wonder weather there's a difference between the producers of RAM.
 
Kingston has for me allways seemed like a quality-brand, but is it?? And how about Apacer?? How's theirs DDR-modules?? And what about Samsung?? Is that a producer of RAM that should stick to making TV's!!!
 
Looking forward in some constructive and usefull replies...
 
 
Best regards
 
Kasper.
Copenhagen, Denmark.

Participate on our website and join the conversation

You have already an account on our website? Use the link below to login.
Login
Create a new user account. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds.
Register
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.

Responses to this topic


data/avatar/default/avatar36.webp

1207 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-03-27
For SDRAM I will only buy Crucial.
For RDRAM I will only buy Samsung.
 
The above manufacturers have proved themselves to me as making very reliable memory modules (0% fail rate on those two).
They have also shown that their memory is very over-clockable if that's your thing.

data/avatar/default/avatar33.webp

4 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-10-30
OP
Hi Bladerunner,
 
Thanks for your reply. But how's Samsung and Crucial when it comes to DDR-modules?? When I look at the prices here in DK, they are as follows for one 256 MB DDR-module:
 
Apacer : $96
Corsair : $132
Crucial : $135
Hyundai : $99
Kingston : $98
Samsung : $84
 
PQI, Veritech, Simple Technology were also among, but I thought these 6 were enough... ;o)
But as you see the Crucial and Corsair is more than 50% more expensive than Samsung - does that indicate a overprice for Crucial and Corsair, or does that indicates that Samsung is crap... no effence... ;o)
 
 
Best regards
 
Kasper
Copenhagen, Denmark

data/avatar/default/avatar33.webp

723 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-02-05
I have 2 DDR modules from Samsung, CAS 2.5 PC2100 at 256 MB each.
No problems yet.

data/avatar/default/avatar36.webp

1207 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-03-27
Well, when it comes to DDR-RAM I've only actually built one PC based around it.
As I'd had so much luck with both Samsung & Crucial for the other types I decided on one of those for DDR, picked Crucial because I could order directly from with free delivery.
 
To be honest, no memory is 'crap' but some seems to be better than others.
The majority of non-branded memory out there is still 'Major on third' (Major manufacturer chips on third party pcb's).
Kingston is always a name I too associate with good quality, however the Kingston RIMM's I purchased couldn't be over-clocked at all.
The Samsung ones are running in my system on a 110mhz FSB rock-solid.
As a rule you get what you pay for.
With memory you tend to find a manufacturer you like and then stick with them.

data/avatar/default/avatar26.webp

28 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-05-30
As far as DDR goes, I have used two different brands than anybody has talked about.
 
Kingmax PC2100 256mg 2 sticks each
OCZ PC2700 256mg 2 sticks each
 
The Kingmax DDR was very stable, I just wanted to upgrade to PC2700 OCZ for further overclockability with my P4 setup. My only gripe about the OCZ ram is the fact that in my BIOS I had to set all my ram timings to "by spd" which didn't affect performance becuase it choose the best settings anyway.

data/avatar/default/avatar24.webp

19 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-12-19
Mushkin in all my systems, and not a bad chip in the bunch. They have also proven fairly stable in FSB OC situations, which is what I spend my time doing, as I test multiple platforms with multiple CPUs/RAM configurations.