Does WinXP worth ?

This is a discussion about Does WinXP worth ? in the Windows Hardware category; I'd like to ask if WinXP does really worth. A friend of mine told me that although it's on beta version yet,it's more stable than Win2k!Really?When someone is on Win2k,does the upgrade worth ?.

Windows Hardware 9627 This topic was started by , . Last reply by ,


data/avatar/default/avatar08.webp

22 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-07-08
I'd like to ask if WinXP does really worth.A friend of mine told me that although it's on beta version yet,it's more stable than Win2k!Really?When someone is on Win2k,does the upgrade worth ?

Participate in our website and join the conversation

You already have an account on our website? To log in, use the link provided below.
Login
Create a new user account. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds.
Register
This subject has been archived. New comments and votes cannot be submitted.
Mar 25
Created
Mar 26
Last Response
0
Likes
2 minutes
Read Time
User User User User User
Users

Responses to this topic


data/avatar/default/avatar29.webp

1209 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-10-27
depends what you want to do? if you installed win2k cause you liked the stability, but missed some of the multimedia, compatibility, features, etc. and were disappointed not to see it being as high in win2k as it was in win9x, then upgrade it to XP.
 
 
As for it being more stable. well, the reason why i'm so pro-XP, is because it seriously does stomp a mud hole in win2k in every performance test here. XP happens to be the best OS i've ran in years on this machine, it may vary on yours, who knows.
 
That's all I got to say about that.

data/avatar/default/avatar39.webp

3867 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-02-04
Whistler=Beta 2
Windows 2000=Done
 
Think about it.......

data/avatar/default/avatar29.webp

1209 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-10-27
lol
 
win2k = done
winxp = beta 2 and already better than win2k
 
think about it
 
[This message has been edited by jdulmage (edited 25 March 2001).]

data/avatar/default/avatar29.webp

1778 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-01-18
yea man, i gotta agree with JD on this one, and i'm sure others will also, XP (and i'm running 2446!) is already better than win2k, i don't care what ver. of 2k you are running (2195.1 , 2195.1;SP1 , 2195.1;SP2) it doesn't matter.

data/avatar/default/avatar16.webp

1615 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-03-25
winxp = the sh1t
win2k = slow as sh1t
 
[This message has been edited by Four and Twenty (edited 26 March 2001).]

data/avatar/default/avatar36.webp

112 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-02-10
Hey guy's, i'm stuck with an older version of XP (2416). Would you say this version of XP is as better then Win2k as you say 2446 and up is??

data/avatar/default/avatar29.webp

1778 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-01-18
well, the only builds of Whistler i have used are: 2223, 2257, 2428, and 2446. 2223 was worthless and should never have been released, 2257 was ok but i was forced to format the drive it was on because it was so slow, 2428 was the sh1t and so is 2446. i dunno about 2416, i have never used it.