Guys for a heavy gamer and Internet user which OS is better?

Thx By the way the card listed in my sig is not the card I plan to game with

Windows Software 5498 This topic was started by ,


data/avatar/default/avatar35.webp

1030 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-02-19
Thx
 
By the way the card listed in my sig is not the card I plan to game with

Participate on our website and join the conversation

You have already an account on our website? Use the link below to login.
Login
Create a new user account. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds.
Register
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.

Responses to this topic


data/avatar/default/avatar29.webp

64 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-01-27
I have used both in the past and I think both are good. Compatability is the main problem and both seem good to me.

data/avatar/default/avatar19.webp

3857 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-03-29
I like XP since compatibility seems more "pass-through" than with 2K.

data/avatar/default/avatar31.webp

3 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-05-16
hey, i use windows xp pro with the following
 
asus a7v266-e
three ata 100 hard drives (swap file on two non os drives)
768 crucial ddr ram
geforce 4 4400 ti
soundblaster live gamer
microsoft natural pro keyboard
microsoft intillmouse cordless
xp 1700
on a 512 sdsl
 
it rocks..
 
i used 2000 pro first, but i found xp alot better, much more stable

data/avatar/default/avatar15.webp

1047 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-04-17
XP Pro since it'll give you less hassle with older games.

data/avatar/default/avatar19.webp

347 Posts
Location United States
Joined 2002-03-21
XP is more compatable with gaming imho.

data/avatar/default/avatar39.webp

3867 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-02-04
Try both yourself and see....

data/avatar/default/avatar02.webp

238 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-04-25
XP Pro is definitely better for games that 2k pro, with compatibility, speed (sometimes)and stability!

data/avatar/default/avatar32.webp

989 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-08-14
I've used both and the answer is a resounding Windows XP Pro.

data/avatar/default/avatar40.webp

3087 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-01-21
For what your asking, go XP. I've found it to be a bit quicker in gaming than 2k. My machines are on 24/7 unless I'm on vacaction or working on them.

data/avatar/default/avatar12.webp

1915 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-03-30
XP, little more stable and games are more compatible

data/avatar/default/avatar39.webp

120 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-08-21
I use XP. but got to make sure system is fully supported
if its not just use 2k with sp2 + all those pre-sp3 fixes
don't install sp3 beta..because there is only one beta out..and alot of new fixes have come out now

data/avatar/default/avatar23.webp

5 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-03-23
ex-pee...
 
ok ok.. XP Pro

data/avatar/default/avatar07.webp

11 Posts
Location -
Joined 1999-10-28
What card are you going to game with? Wanna sell that G550?

data/avatar/default/avatar18.webp

83 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-02-07
....Win98....
 
I'd go XP. 2000 isn't a gaming platform, even if it IS better than XP.

data/avatar/default/avatar39.webp

3867 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-02-04
2000 is support by many games, Just look at all the games that support XP. See that little 2000 to the left of XP?

data/avatar/default/avatar28.webp

295 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-07-04
Wow...
I would say Windows 2000. I've had far more problems with XP. For me, Win2k has been a rock no matter if I'm gaming, developing, whatever... XP has been anything but reliable for me. I will confirm, however, that XP ran quake 3 at 20FPS faster than 2k. So in that respect, it sure seems faster. However, I value stability over gaming performance. That's why I like 2k over XP.
 
I'm waiting for service pack 1 then I'm gonna try XP again.
 
After all, read through the thread YOU created here
http://www.ntcompatible.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=19442

data/avatar/default/avatar20.webp

18 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-05-22
Geez, never thought I'd see so many people touting XP. I can't speak for XP since I've never used it, but I'm running 2k Server and haven't had any problems. I can play anything that's out, except for older DOS stuff. Sure wish someone would rewrite Crusader: No Remorse for Windows.
2k is rock solid for me. Lately I've played: Counter Strike, MechWarrior 4, Crimson Skies, Commanche 4, BG2, Descent Freespace 2, Silent Hunter 2, IL-2 Sturmovik, and Jedi Knight 2 (awesome game). I hesitate to use XP since I've heard there's some equipment you can't yet get drivers for, and heck, 2k works great.

data/avatar/default/avatar34.webp

198 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-06-03
I run 2k, and it's an excellent game platform. Sure, XP may get you 20 more FPS in Quake III, but can you really tell the difference between 159 and 179fps? 2k can be just as fast if you disable unnecessary services and apply all the updates.
 
XP is just to dumbed down. 2000 has a nice clean interface. XP looks like a child's Playskool toy. 2k has a very useful help system. XP is geared towards end users (ie: Is it plugged in? Are you sure? Really? 100% sure???) XP also has a ton of useless crap like system rollback which just chews up space on your hard drive.