Has Win2k pro as fast as Win98 now for games? can anyone sup
Can anyone supply some benchmarks to compare? 3dmark2000, q3, UT, and others? Celeron II 566@875 on a Abit BH6 Rev 1. 01, 128 Pc100, Matrox G450 32 DH, SBlive Value, Supra Express 56i ISA, Win98FE.
Can anyone supply some benchmarks to compare? 3dmark2000, q3, UT, and others?
------------------
Celeron II 566@875 on a Abit BH6 Rev 1.01, 128 Pc100, Matrox G450 32 DH,
SBlive Value, Supra Express 56i ISA, Win98FE
------------------
Celeron II 566@875 on a Abit BH6 Rev 1.01, 128 Pc100, Matrox G450 32 DH,
SBlive Value, Supra Express 56i ISA, Win98FE
Participate on our website and join the conversation
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.
Responses to this topic
no Win2k isnt as fast as win98 for games I dont think. It might be faster now that DX 8 is out but then that depends on DX 8 optimised drivers. Either way no matter what people say Win2k isnt designed for games. Yes it can play them but it doesnt mean it will be as fast as an OS designed to run them like Whistler is (don't even bother using a 9x line product because they are being phased out anyway). Anyway if you can get a copy of whistler use that otherwise use 2k.
With dx8 and the nvidia beta 7.17 there is HUGE increase in performance. The games actually ran better with that configuration than dx8 / any winme driver I tried. The 7.xx drivers apparently fixes some agp problems in win2000.
3dmark2000 scores went up about 2000 points !
win2000 will be a great gaming platform, even if it wasnt indended to be.
Looky here: http://www.overclockedcafe.com/articles.htm
3dmark2000 scores went up about 2000 points !
win2000 will be a great gaming platform, even if it wasnt indended to be.
Looky here: http://www.overclockedcafe.com/articles.htm
