Hey, Esselbach! Verstanden mich?
This is a discussion about Hey, Esselbach! Verstanden mich? in the Feedback category; tell me why I can't format the following using the tt code? find / -type d -name \*wine\* 2> /dev/null why does it appear as I typed it but without formatting? tell me why I can't nest two simple formatting tags? want bigger than teeny-tiny 'tt' text here why does the above only work with the tags in reverse ord ...
tell me why I can't format the following using the "tt" code?
[tt] find / -type d -name \*wine\* 2> /dev/null [/tt]
why does it appear as I typed it but without formatting?
tell me why I can't nest two simple formatting tags?
[tt][size:4] want bigger than teeny-tiny 'tt' text here [/tt]
why does the above only work with the tags in reverse order?
[size:4][tt] bigger than teeny-tiny 'tt' text here [/tt]
better still, why don't the formatting tags have simple modifiers?
[tt size=3] want 'tt' text but a bit bigger [/tt]
most of all: Why isn't there a link on this site to the formatting tag syntax?
[tt] find / -type d -name \*wine\* 2> /dev/null [/tt]
why does it appear as I typed it but without formatting?
tell me why I can't nest two simple formatting tags?
[tt][size:4] want bigger than teeny-tiny 'tt' text here [/tt]
why does the above only work with the tags in reverse order?
[size:4][tt] bigger than teeny-tiny 'tt' text here [/tt]
better still, why don't the formatting tags have simple modifiers?
[tt size=3] want 'tt' text but a bit bigger [/tt]
most of all: Why isn't there a link on this site to the formatting tag syntax?
Participate in our website and join the conversation
This subject has been archived. New comments and votes cannot be submitted.
Jul 14
Jul 14
0
1 minute
Responses to this topic
That's because the [tt] tag based on Perl regular expression. I may change this in a future version. Please use the
Code:
Code:
...tag in the meantime.
