I don't mean to piss everyone off..........
Haven't you noticed that all of the questions asked here are all about Windows 2000 and the errors it has or is given out to people. Some games don't work, hardware doesn't work, BSOD, illegal operations, sudden changes in the OS.
Haven't you noticed that all of the questions asked here are all about Windows 2000 and the errors it has or is given out to people. Some games don't work, hardware doesn't work, BSOD, illegal operations, sudden changes in the OS. Just goes to show that the OS isn't very good. I "was" using Windows 2000 awhile ago and got rid of it because it simply stinks. I rather have better compatibility in return for the odd error or two, then have a stable OS and nothing working right. That's why it's stable, cause they made sure next to nothing works on it, they "babied" it to get it working right. Crappy apps, games and hardware support, but it's stable. Now i like Windows 2000 because of it's features, but if w2k is not going to run programs well then forget it. There was only 1 program, one that i use a lot, called RPGMaker 95. I was done testing all of my games and apps with windows 2000 and discovered they all ran, last proggy on the list was RPG Maker, go to start it, doesn't work. Because of 1 program not running, which happened to be the one i use a lot, i had to uninstall windows 2000.
edit!!
although I don't believe this anymore, it's still funny to see this post. I shouldn't have edited it, oh well...lol
[This message has been edited by jdulmage (edited 20 December 2000).]
edit!!
although I don't believe this anymore, it's still funny to see this post. I shouldn't have edited it, oh well...lol
[This message has been edited by jdulmage (edited 20 December 2000).]
Participate on our website and join the conversation
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.
Responses to this topic
) ) )
This thread will go to the 7th page, believe me!!!
Open all the available channels on your ATM connection to the same isp so that you create multiple concurrent virtual tunnels and bypass all the giga routers on the backbone that leads to Jul ... what? ... image ??? isp in order to hack his box and access all of his pre-teenage por*-images secret collection!
Of course, if you do not dual pre-format your boot HD with DOS 5 and 6.2 AND not send an "cd/dos/ cd/dos/dos cd.." ( am I right DosFreak ?) command over the net, you won't see anything.
Is that the way you grabbed this photo?
This thread will go to the 7th page, believe me!!!
Open all the available channels on your ATM connection to the same isp so that you create multiple concurrent virtual tunnels and bypass all the giga routers on the backbone that leads to Jul ... what? ... image ??? isp in order to hack his box and access all of his pre-teenage por*-images secret collection!
Of course, if you do not dual pre-format your boot HD with DOS 5 and 6.2 AND not send an "cd/dos/ cd/dos/dos cd.." ( am I right DosFreak ?) command over the net, you won't see anything.
Is that the way you grabbed this photo?
This is the same dumbass who claimed he got Windows 2000 to run some things better by installing it over DOS..... No surprise about the quality of THIS message.
Note the blatant inconsistency in his message, quoted verbatim:
1) "I rather have better compatibility in return for the odd error or two, then have a stable OS and nothing working right. That's why it's stable, cause they made sure next to nothing works on it"
2) "I was done testing all of my games and apps with windows 2000 and discovered they all ran, last proggy on the list was RPG Maker, go to start it, doesn't work. Because of 1 program not running, which happened to be the one i use a lot, i had to uninstall windows 2000"
In quote #1, he says that "next to nothing works on it" (exact quote) and then in #2, he tested EVERYTHING he had, and "discovered they all ran" except for ONE GAME. He concludes from this data that the OS completely sucks and isn't worth using. This is a remarkable conclusion to draw. I would expect that most people should be thrilled to find this exceptionally good ratio of "working" to "nonfunctional" software on a new OS.
Nonetheless, I have the solution for our young jester jdulmage:
Hey kid, a friend of mine installed Windows 2000 on his old Commodore 64 and everything he ever tried to run since then has worked great, including his Mac and Linux software. He even got an old copy of WordStar for CP/M running in it. Absolute genius, I tell you. Keep in mind that you'll need the 128k RAM expansion unit before Windows 2000 will run. After you try this, see me about buying a certain bridge near Manhattan.
Note the blatant inconsistency in his message, quoted verbatim:
1) "I rather have better compatibility in return for the odd error or two, then have a stable OS and nothing working right. That's why it's stable, cause they made sure next to nothing works on it"
2) "I was done testing all of my games and apps with windows 2000 and discovered they all ran, last proggy on the list was RPG Maker, go to start it, doesn't work. Because of 1 program not running, which happened to be the one i use a lot, i had to uninstall windows 2000"
In quote #1, he says that "next to nothing works on it" (exact quote) and then in #2, he tested EVERYTHING he had, and "discovered they all ran" except for ONE GAME. He concludes from this data that the OS completely sucks and isn't worth using. This is a remarkable conclusion to draw. I would expect that most people should be thrilled to find this exceptionally good ratio of "working" to "nonfunctional" software on a new OS.
Nonetheless, I have the solution for our young jester jdulmage:
Hey kid, a friend of mine installed Windows 2000 on his old Commodore 64 and everything he ever tried to run since then has worked great, including his Mac and Linux software. He even got an old copy of WordStar for CP/M running in it. Absolute genius, I tell you. Keep in mind that you'll need the 128k RAM expansion unit before Windows 2000 will run. After you try this, see me about buying a certain bridge near Manhattan.
Heh heh .... I just read the rest of these replies. I'll be surprised if this clown ever shows up here again.
Is that picture above actually him? Ha ha!!! Whoever placed their wager on him being 10 years old wins the grand prize.
Hey Jdulmage, make sure you post another stupid message every other week or so. You could single-handedly keep these discussion groups going strong.
Is that picture above actually him? Ha ha!!! Whoever placed their wager on him being 10 years old wins the grand prize.
Hey Jdulmage, make sure you post another stupid message every other week or so. You could single-handedly keep these discussion groups going strong.
Just do a search for that name inside the search functions.
Your right, it may be interesting.
------------------
The information contained in this post has no nutritional value. I remove myself from all responsibility of the consequences should you print this post and consume it without taking the proper precautions.
Warning: This text best viewed with surround sound.
Your right, it may be interesting.
------------------
The information contained in this post has no nutritional value. I remove myself from all responsibility of the consequences should you print this post and consume it without taking the proper precautions.
Warning: This text best viewed with surround sound.
i get about 30 search results his last post was http://www.ntcompatible.com/ubb/Forum2/HTML/000605.html
posted 25 March 2000 20:36
posted 25 March 2000 20:36
Perhaps he has registered under a new profile...
Let's watch the silliest posts, maybe he is around
Hmmm ... Maybe this post will help to jump to the next page.
Let's watch the silliest posts, maybe he is around
Hmmm ... Maybe this post will help to jump to the next page.
Even if his name is different, his IP address will be the same.
Just ask Phillip or SHS nicely, I'm sure they would know.
------------------
The information contained in this post has no nutritional value. I remove myself from all responsibility of the consequences should you print this post and consume it without taking the proper precautions.
Warning: This text best viewed with surround sound.
Just ask Phillip or SHS nicely, I'm sure they would know.
------------------
The information contained in this post has no nutritional value. I remove myself from all responsibility of the consequences should you print this post and consume it without taking the proper precautions.
Warning: This text best viewed with surround sound.
