LIST OF SCSI ADAPTERS DROPPED IN XP
those bastards mine worked fine but i did take a performance hit with my old drives
those bastards
mine worked fine but i did take a performance hit with my old drives
mine worked fine but i did take a performance hit with my old drives
Participate on our website and join the conversation
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.
Responses to this topic
i havent touched the sp yet
waiting till it's not beta
waiting till it's not beta
guys how fast is SCSI supposed to be?
I have 2 SCSi HDD's (9.1 GB each) hooked up to my AIC-7895 Dual ULTRA SCSI onboard.
In nero when i tell it to test my drive speeds this is what i get:
IDE HDD (Partitioned)
C:\ 12,172 Kb/s
F:\ 14,912kb/s
IBM ULTRA SCSI master (partitioned)
E:\ 11,648 KB/s (BOOT HDD)
H:\ 8,842 KB/s
IBM ULTRA SCSI Slave
D:\ 3,443 Kb/s
G:\5,900 KB/s
I think SCSI should be faster than IDE?
i was not dong anything while this test was taking place:
DK440LX
Dual PII~300Mhz
512Mb RAM
Windows XP
Yes yes, i Am getting a new PC soon and moving up to modern technology...
I have 2 SCSi HDD's (9.1 GB each) hooked up to my AIC-7895 Dual ULTRA SCSI onboard.
In nero when i tell it to test my drive speeds this is what i get:
IDE HDD (Partitioned)
C:\ 12,172 Kb/s
F:\ 14,912kb/s
IBM ULTRA SCSI master (partitioned)
E:\ 11,648 KB/s (BOOT HDD)
H:\ 8,842 KB/s
IBM ULTRA SCSI Slave
D:\ 3,443 Kb/s
G:\5,900 KB/s
I think SCSI should be faster than IDE?
i was not dong anything while this test was taking place:
DK440LX
Dual PII~300Mhz
512Mb RAM
Windows XP
Yes yes, i Am getting a new PC soon and moving up to modern technology...
if i look at my sys event viewer i see a warning at boot
driver turned off write behind caching for this drive
i dont think it messes with raw transfer speeds just slows down overall performance
driver turned off write behind caching for this drive
i dont think it messes with raw transfer speeds just slows down overall performance
my hd's in nero read 26000 kb's
