LOW DISK PERFORMANCE ON XP
After beta2, I'm using XP as my only os now. So I started to investigate everything. The first thing I noticed is low harddsik performance. First I tried coping big files between my partitions. I checked with taskinfo's fat read n write.
After beta2, I'm using XP as my only os now. So I started to investigate everything. The first thing I noticed is low harddsik performance. First I tried coping big files between my partitions. I checked with taskinfo's fat read n write. It's avarage is 7000 kb. That's is nearly 11000 kb with winme. Then I bench the hd with winbench99, again scores are %70 of winme, also sisoft's hd test gave the half of the score that gave with winme....
duron650@ 1027 158x6.5
Iwill kk266 686B ATA/100
128 APACER c 2,2,2
Western Digital 40gb 7200rpm
-----Let the XP tweak begin-----
duron650@ 1027 158x6.5
Iwill kk266 686B ATA/100
128 APACER c 2,2,2
Western Digital 40gb 7200rpm
-----Let the XP tweak begin-----
Participate on our website and join the conversation
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.
Responses to this topic
btw I forgot to mention, before xp, it was a nightmare to enable udma on secondary channel, with dma enabled I got lots of troubles coping data from cdrom to hd. I also had lots of problems with sblive. Now it all went away. Both channel's dma came enabled after installion and didn't give any trouble
