Memory Performance

I have a Thunderbird 1ghz with 384mb of pc 133 ram. I am having a problem with the performance of my ram. When I run the performance benchmark in SiSoft Sandra I get marks that look like this. Int ALU/RAM Bandwidth 374 MB/s Float FPU/RAM Bandwidth 398 MB/s The reference system that I'm using is an Athlon 1ghz KT133 ...

Windows Hardware 9627 This topic was started by ,


data/avatar/default/avatar38.webp

125 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-01-17
I have a Thunderbird 1ghz with 384mb of pc 133 ram. I am having a problem with the performance of my ram. When I run the performance benchmark in SiSoft Sandra I get marks that look like this.
 
Int ALU/RAM Bandwidth 374 MB/s
Float FPU/RAM Bandwidth 398 MB/s
 
The reference system that I'm using is an Athlon 1ghz KT133, w/256MB
It posts numbers that look like this
 
Int ALU/RAM Bandwidth 434 MB/s
Float FPU/RAM Bandwidth 521 MB/s
 
Now I really wouldn't have a problem with the difference in these numbers if hadn't noticed that my system wasn't running up to par. My page file size is set to 64mb. I think that this is the optimal setting because the peak under performance in the task manager comes close to the limit but doesn't exceed it.
 
I have no idea of what else to do in order to get the memory running like it should. If any one can give me any suggestions on how I could increase the performance that would be great.

Participate on our website and join the conversation

You have already an account on our website? Use the link below to login.
Login
Create a new user account. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds.
Register
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.

Responses to this topic


data/avatar/default/avatar16.webp

1623 Posts
Location -
Joined 1999-12-06
well what OS is the test system on?? And 64mb SWAP FILE?!?!?! I set mine to at least 700 with 384mb of RAM.

data/avatar/default/avatar38.webp

125 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-01-17
OP
I am running WIn2k. I read that you want your page file to be as small as possible but not so small that your applications exceed the size. I did have it at 500mb, after I switched it to 64mb I noticed a dramatic increase in the performance. With the page file so low I guess that the system accesses the RAM sooner (I read this and I'm not to sure how it works.) I will change it to 300mb and see if that gives me better or worse performance.
 
------------------
Soyo K7VTA
T-bird 1ghz
384mb pc 133
GeForce2 GTS 64mb ddr
Maxtor 30gb 7200
Western Digital 30gb 7200

data/avatar/default/avatar19.webp

3857 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-03-29
I use (and have always used) small page files as well. It's been a big boost in performance for all of my systems.