Norton AV 2002 or Norton Corp.Ed 7.61 ?
Hi, This would be for a standalone laptop, P-4/1. 7GHz/1024MB RAM etc. , running Outlook XP (on a POP/SMTP ISP, no Exchange). The client has both Norton Anti Virus 2002 as well as Norton AV Corporate Edition 7.
Hi,
This would be for a standalone laptop, P-4/1.7GHz/1024MB RAM etc.,
running Outlook XP (on a POP/SMTP ISP, no Exchange).
The client has both Norton Anti Virus 2002 as well as Norton AV Corporate Edition 7.61 - any pros & cons between the both?
Performance wise-realtime scanning speed, Word document opening speed, efficiency, virus-catching performance etc., does one differ all that much from the other?
TIA,
Chip
This would be for a standalone laptop, P-4/1.7GHz/1024MB RAM etc.,
running Outlook XP (on a POP/SMTP ISP, no Exchange).
The client has both Norton Anti Virus 2002 as well as Norton AV Corporate Edition 7.61 - any pros & cons between the both?
Performance wise-realtime scanning speed, Word document opening speed, efficiency, virus-catching performance etc., does one differ all that much from the other?
TIA,
Chip
Participate on our website and join the conversation
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.
Responses to this topic
They are more or less identical.
They do have slightly different interfaces, but they both scan through the same engine and are both equally good at catching virus's.
I use Corporate Edition at work where all my PC's are managed from a central server.
I use NAV 2002 at home because, well because you cannot just buy a copy of corporate edition, it has to be purchased via licenses.
They do have slightly different interfaces, but they both scan through the same engine and are both equally good at catching virus's.
I use Corporate Edition at work where all my PC's are managed from a central server.
I use NAV 2002 at home because, well because you cannot just buy a copy of corporate edition, it has to be purchased via licenses.
Why? Because sometimes, the client will not have time to do a full manual scan right before they send e-mail attachments;
This is because the Real time scanner will be set to 'Smart Scan' for only certain attachments, as opposed to all files (for system speed).
Also, in NAV 2002, if I disable the Office PlugIn, will .doc & .xls files still be scanned by the RealTime scanner if those extensions are in the 'extensions to be scanned' list ?
Thanks.
This is because the Real time scanner will be set to 'Smart Scan' for only certain attachments, as opposed to all files (for system speed).
Also, in NAV 2002, if I disable the Office PlugIn, will .doc & .xls files still be scanned by the RealTime scanner if those extensions are in the 'extensions to be scanned' list ?
Thanks.
At home with AV2002 I leave the default settings on.
That is every file is automatically scanned before execution.
All e-mail is scanned before being sent and every e-mail is scanned as it arrives into my inbox.
The overhead due to this high level of security is non existant.
That is every file is automatically scanned before execution.
All e-mail is scanned before being sent and every e-mail is scanned as it arrives into my inbox.
The overhead due to this high level of security is non existant.
I had the NAV 2002, but after using it for a month I got a bug in which it would no longer do a full system scan. It would give me an Internet Explorer 'script error' everytime I tried to run one. I have IE 6 with all the latest patches. I did the fix prescribed on Norton's website to no avail. I have Windows 2000 SP2. I'm mostly convinced (but not certain) that the bug manifested itself because of me previously having NAV 2001. I typically don't have any problems with programs, so when I do, it is easily memorable for me. Also I just found it to be way to annoying (especially when I was on 56K connection) to make it worthwhile. It seemed as though it would send all of my emails twice and it would just take forever over that connection. I began using Corp. Edition and I like it much better. No more 'I'm smarter than you' crap from the program. It reminded me more of NAV 2001 which I had previously to 2002. After I put on 2002 I wished I had just stayed with 2001. I'm happy with NAV Corp. Ed. it does all that I want it too. NAV 2001 has caught a few viruses for me in the past, and NAV Corp Ed. caught one for me several months ago while I was surfing a ***** site. Just for the record I do not have a slow computer either.
Well that is really the point here isn't it.
Unless you are a business and have bought Norton Corporate Edition along with the licenses, I believe currently the minimum purchase is 10 licenses, you cannot run this program at home.
To do so would be theft and a breach of the license your company agreed to when they purchased the software.
That is the reason why I use NAV2002 at home because although I have three PC's at home I couldn't warrant purchasing 10 corporate licenses for home use.
So, when it comes to home use you've got a few choices.
There are a number of free anti-virus programs popping up, although I firmly believe in you get what you pay for.
There is McAfee but due to issues I've had with their software in the past I wont touch this.
That leaves NAV2002, costs about £20 and that includes one years worth of weekly definition updates, additional years come in at about £10.
It's running on my home PC at the moment taking up 5.0MB via two services, offers protection on every single file in my system and fully protects me from e-mail virus's.
It also blocks harmful scripts too.
As using Corporate edition at home (unless you've purchased the 10 licenses) is illegal, it's really a moot comparison.
Unless you are a business and have bought Norton Corporate Edition along with the licenses, I believe currently the minimum purchase is 10 licenses, you cannot run this program at home.
To do so would be theft and a breach of the license your company agreed to when they purchased the software.
That is the reason why I use NAV2002 at home because although I have three PC's at home I couldn't warrant purchasing 10 corporate licenses for home use.
So, when it comes to home use you've got a few choices.
There are a number of free anti-virus programs popping up, although I firmly believe in you get what you pay for.
There is McAfee but due to issues I've had with their software in the past I wont touch this.
That leaves NAV2002, costs about £20 and that includes one years worth of weekly definition updates, additional years come in at about £10.
It's running on my home PC at the moment taking up 5.0MB via two services, offers protection on every single file in my system and fully protects me from e-mail virus's.
It also blocks harmful scripts too.
As using Corporate edition at home (unless you've purchased the 10 licenses) is illegal, it's really a moot comparison.
Odd, all military members can download all Norton Antivirus/Mcafee products from the CERT webpage and use them at home. The military even encoruages it. If your in the military then go for it...if not then ask your sys admin at work....if you bring files from home to work or work at home then you you should be able to use AV at home without worrying about licensing issues.
DOS, I never heard of that. My wife is Active Duty and I worked for the DOD, as an IMO, and we were never encouraged to take products home. Now I do know for a fact that the Army has a blanket license for some software, but unless you are doing work at home, you are not encouraged to take it home. THo the Army does encourage you to have Formflow, and various other proggies that are usefull