NT & W2K remote access
This is a discussion about NT & W2K remote access in the Windows Software category; I currently have a few NT boxes and 2 with RAS PDC is on NT4. I at some stage would like Terminal Services added and was thinking of a new box but this time with a Windows 2000 Terminal Services CAL box and a few RAS links on the same box.
I currently have a few NT boxes and 2 with RAS PDC is on NT4. I at some stage would like Terminal Services added and was thinking of a new box but this time with a Windows 2000 Terminal Services CAL box and a few RAS links on the same box. Is this a good idea in terms of mixing the environment? All NT4's or should I move all to Windows 2000 Server?
I hope to get away with just one W2K box now as the RAS/ Terminal Services, anyone with some good experience?
C.
I hope to get away with just one W2K box now as the RAS/ Terminal Services, anyone with some good experience?
C.
Participate in our website and join the conversation
This subject has been archived. New comments and votes cannot be submitted.
Aug 14
Aug 18
0
1 minute
Responses to this topic
well w2k uses TS or now ATS snap in's. I did not really understand your question. can you explain to me a bit more???
as far as remote access is concerned every machine is for itself. so mixing different stuff on the same network, only problem i can see is you have to have all the clients for them from wherever you are administering.
If all of them are using Terminal services, you can go through the web browser or TSMMC snap in.
as far as remote access is concerned every machine is for itself. so mixing different stuff on the same network, only problem i can see is you have to have all the clients for them from wherever you are administering.
If all of them are using Terminal services, you can go through the web browser or TSMMC snap in.
