Ok guys do you like and use WindowsXP and if so why?

If you dont like it why also?

Windows Hardware 9627 This topic was started by ,


data/avatar/default/avatar35.webp

1030 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-02-19
If you dont like it why also?

Participate on our website and join the conversation

You have already an account on our website? Use the link below to login.
Login
Create a new user account. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds.
Register
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.

Responses to this topic


data/avatar/default/avatar19.webp

690 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-05-21
LIKE:
 
Improved application compatibility over W2k.
Fast boot times (especially compared to W2k).
Comes with working WDM drivers for the SBLive (with 4+ speaker support = no need to install LiveWare ).
Vastly better than W9x/ME.
Removes any need to dual boot W9x/ME.
 
DISLIKE:
 
The fact that Microsoft assumes that XP Pro users are going to want to have stupid things like simple networking turned on by default. It takes a while hunting in the options to turn all of these "features" off.
Can't have preview pane in explorer at the same time as the folder list and even then it only shows pictures, not videos.
Product activation.
 
OVERALL:
 
For people still using W9x/ME, it's a fantastic upgrade.
For people using W2k, it doesn't offer much that W2k doesn't already do.

data/avatar/default/avatar40.webp

3087 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-01-21
I agree. I don't see anything XP really offers me over 2k except a headache and frustration. For a newbie, sure, XP is great, but for me I find it more difficult to do things because I have to find where MS put it this time.
Product Craptivation: I do not like being told or spied on. I will upgrade my computer however and whenever I please. It's a pain in the neck, not to mention an issue with my privacy.
Integrated Firewall: Hmm, nice guesture, but I'm sorta leery about a firewall from MS, as security breeches come to mind.
 
XP is what MS should've done earlier: use the NT, or another stable code, for both home and professional OS's.
I will stick with Win2k,thank you. I'm gonna explore other OS's to fool with. Hello FreeBSD! Meet VMware.

data/avatar/default/avatar35.webp

7 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-09-01
if you're asking that, you probably don't need to

data/avatar/default/avatar19.webp

690 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-05-21
Okay, have you ever shared a folder in XP? If simple networking is turned on, instead of giving you the ability to define whether or not each individual user can read/write or have full control as in Win2k, XP will give you 2 options:
 
Allow all users to view the contents of this directory
-or-
Allow all users to modify the contents of this directory
 
Personally I don't like this; it's fine for the Home version of XP, but it really shouldn't be in the Professional version. Fortunately it can be turned off if you know where to look - it's in the folder options control panel.

data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp

319 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-05-11
Ah I see thanks alot, I turned it off immediately. I was wondering how I would share a folder so only I would have full access to it from my 486 with win2k (a server and dont laugh it has lots of ram 24).
 
I like winXP a little more now.
 
Okay back to topic, one thing I also like is it empties the recycle bin immediately instead of waiting 3 secs as it did in win2k.
 
The quick logon time is also very nice.
 
What I dont like is when I shut down, it takes a while then it says "now its safe to turn off your computer". Why dont it turn it off immediately?
 
And my GTXP dont work right either, even after decreasing my ram to 256. Exiting quake 3 sometimes freezes the whole system withouth even a BSOD.