Overcloking prob with win2k

Hi. I am trying to overclock my win2k system to something well within the limits of my hardware. I am simply clocking my 700e, to 800, which is totaly possible. I boot windows just fine, but when i try to use a processor intesive application, like quake, windows will crash into a blue screen of death and read MACHI ...

Windows Hardware 9627 This topic was started by ,


data/avatar/default/avatar23.webp

89 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-09-10
Hi. I am trying to overclock my win2k system to something well within the limits of my hardware. I am simply clocking my 700e, to 800, which is totaly possible. I boot windows just fine, but when i try to use a processor intesive application, like quake, windows will crash into a blue screen of death and read "MACHINE_EXCEPTION_CHECK" or something like that. IT doesnt really give me enough time to read it. Is there anything i can do to avoid this? Can win2k and overclocked mobo live in harmony?
 
thanks
-oXide
 
p3-700e
asus cusl2 (i815)
ultra160 (thought i'd throw that in)

Participate on our website and join the conversation

You have already an account on our website? Use the link below to login.
Login
Create a new user account. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds.
Register
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.

Responses to this topic


data/avatar/default/avatar37.webp

96 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-08-12
I would like to know the answer myself. I have a 800 cumine that will easily boot into advanced server or pro at 896. it will stay stable until running say MCM2 which is very graphics intensive at 1600x1200. once the race starts up I have about 15 seconds then the sound card stutters and the entire computer locks up.
 
I don't get a BSOD but I can't get to task manager and shut the process down either = a hard or soft reset.
 
I don't really want to run o/c'd, because the server is my domain controller, but I was curious about why the lockup happens. I've been able to post the processor at just under a gig, but the kernel won't even load from there, so running full speed at 900 mhz should be possible, shouldn't it?

data/avatar/default/avatar11.webp

277 Posts
Location -
Joined 1999-09-06
Just stop overclocking and things will work fine.

data/avatar/default/avatar23.webp

89 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-09-10
OP
Quote:Originally posted by Ronin:
Just stop overclocking and things will work fine.

Why would you even bother to post that? That has nothing to do with our question. Does anyone want to post a legitimate answer pertaining to the questions?
-oXide

data/avatar/default/avatar19.webp

690 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-05-21
I assume you have tried raising the voltage and improving the cooling.

data/avatar/default/avatar39.webp

3867 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-02-04
Sounds like a pretty legitimate answer to me. About as legitimate as you can get.
 
Seriously try underclocking and try it.
 
 
"I boot windows just fine, but when i try to use a processor intesive application"
 
Classic symptom of overclocking.

data/avatar/default/avatar23.webp

89 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-09-10
OP
I have plenty of friends with win98 who dont get any probs at all. This is obviously something in win2k aritechture that isnt letting me do this....i want a work around, or at least just a verification that i cant do this in win2k..
-
 

Quote:Originally posted by DosFreak:Sounds like a pretty legitimate answer to me. About as legitimate as you can get.
 
Seriously try underclocking and try it.
 
 
"I boot windows just fine, but when i try to use a processor intesive application"
 
Classic symptom of overclocking.

data/avatar/default/avatar39.webp

3867 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-02-04
"I have plenty of friends with win98 who dont get any probs at all."
 
"This is obviously something in win2k aritechture that isnt letting me do this"
 
Yes, there is. NT is based on stability. 9x is just 9x. It's there.
 
1. NT is more memory intesive than 9x.
2. NT is more processor intesive than 9x.
3. NT requires more stable drivers than 9x.
 
"I am simply clocking my 700e, to 800"
 
You imply that overclocking is "simple". Yes the function of overclocking is simple. Change one bios option and away we go and 9x boots rights up and games happily. All the while errors creep up where you don't even notice them. NT does.

data/avatar/default/avatar11.webp

277 Posts
Location -
Joined 1999-09-06
Wow!!! for once someone backed me up. I've had lots of luck with overclocking. But when thing lock up and you have problems it's always best to put the orginal seetings back in place and see if you are still have problems. If that don't help then you need to look at what other things may be causing your problems. Why overclock a 700 anyways there can't be that much advantage in doing so.
 
Have you tried going back to original settings?
 
...

data/avatar/default/avatar23.webp

89 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-09-10
OP
Yes of course i put back my original settings and yes it works fine. My problem isnt with my default settings, its with my overclocked settings and i want to know how i can over come them...It seems that my only solution is using win98...am i correct? Or will someone give me another indefinite answer
-oXide
 
 

Quote:Originally posted by Ronin:Wow!!! for once someone backed me up. I've had lots of luck with overclocking. But when thing lock up and you have problems it's always best to put the orginal seetings back in place and see if you are still have problems. If that don't help then you need to look at what other things may be causing your problems. Why overclock a 700 anyways there can't be that much advantage in doing so.
 
Have you tried going back to original settings?
 
...

data/avatar/default/avatar39.webp

3867 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-02-04
You could try slowing things down. Memory and such to pinpoint the exact problem. I would recommend slowing everything down in the bios, overclocking the processor and then run one of the processor testing progs from www.tweakfiles.com or run a looping timedemo.

data/avatar/default/avatar11.webp

277 Posts
Location -
Joined 1999-09-06
Ok
 
You want an answer???
 
NO!!!
 
Damn why is it so important that you overclock?? So you can gain 5 Fps in Q3?
 
Just leave things alone if they are working. The old saying goes, "If it aint broke don't fix it" Let's talk about something else.
 
Someone needs to start a football thread. Ya let's talk about sports, because these stupid questions are killing me.
 
...

data/avatar/default/avatar23.webp

89 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-09-10
OP
Yes, I've improved cooling, but havent changed the voltage...would this be nesseary?
 

Quote:Originally posted by Xiven:I assume you have tried raising the voltage and improving the cooling.

data/avatar/default/avatar23.webp

89 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-09-10
OP
No to what, you idiot. If you are not going to resolve my original problem posted in my orinal thread, then you dont need to reply.
 
Anyway, what i've come to conclude, from bits an pieces of other answers, is that to overclock succesfully, i need win98. So fine. I will install win98 on a seperate partition.
 
Right now my FSB and Memory is running at about 114mhz which is fine for my memory, as it is 133mhz. I improved cooling tremendouly, but I havent played with the voltage yet. Would it be nessecary to do so? Will this increas stablility in win2k?
 

Quote:Originally posted by Ronin:Ok
 
You want an answer???
 
NO!!!
 
Damn why is it so important that you overclock?? So you can gain 5 Fps in Q3?
 
Just leave things alone if they are working. The old saying goes, "If it aint broke don't fix it" Let's talk about something else.
 
Someone needs to start a football thread. Ya let's talk about sports, because these stupid questions are killing me.
 
...

data/avatar/default/avatar39.webp

3867 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-02-04
From 700 to 800? Yes, Improve voltage. in .1 increments until stable. 1.67 should be good.

data/avatar/default/avatar23.webp

89 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-09-10
OP
Wow. Instant stability! I changed my core voltage to 1.70, and everything runs just fine now.
Thanks alot!
 

Quote:Originally posted by DosFreak:From 700 to 800? Yes, Improve voltage. in .1 increments until stable. 1.67 should be good.

data/avatar/default/avatar16.webp

1623 Posts
Location -
Joined 1999-12-06
oXide, I got an idea if you keep flaming people on this board i and others will write a letter to SHS asking him to ban you. This is a help board not a flame other users because your stuff isnt working right board. Please be courtious to other users or dont post. We do this to help you not to get bitched at by you. So all im asking is treat the other posters with some respect and dignity.

data/avatar/default/avatar23.webp

89 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-09-10
OP
I post something, and people reply with shit that has nothing to do with my question..is that a legitamate reason for frustration?
 
"HI, I am having a problem overclocking..."
 
"Then dont overclock"
 
Wtf kinda answer is that? My frustration is valid..though it may seem i am "flaming" people, a closer look would reveal nothing more but human emotion.
-oXide
 
[This message has been edited by oXide (edited 11 September 2000).]

data/avatar/default/avatar33.webp

24 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-08-27
i would say up the voltage!
 
my k6-3 450 is running at 500 and when at 2.3v it seemed fine untill you had run hl for about an hour (cpu hits about 45 degrees c) then it locked up - upped the voltage to 2.4 and its fine - so try it - it will work - check overclockers.com for better cooling etc

data/avatar/default/avatar16.webp

1623 Posts
Location -
Joined 1999-12-06
yes but this isnt an overclocking forum its an NTCOMAPTIBLE ONE. You said your system was overclocked and wouldnt boot 2k, ronin simply said to not overclock it. Yes its an answer not the one your looking for but still doesnt merit the responses you gave to him. I just want everyone to be cool to each other and not go fly off the handle when someone gives you an obvious solution to the problem your having. Even if its not the one your looking for its still an answer.