P4 with SDRAM
Although I wouldn't go for one personally, I want to know if anyone around here has a P4 with PC133 memory? How do you like it?
Although I wouldn't go for one personally, I want to know if anyone around here has a P4 with PC133 memory? How do you like it?
Participate on our website and join the conversation
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.
Responses to this topic
Ummmm, I'm gonna disagree on RDRAM not being better than SDRAM on the P4 front SHS. Yeah, the latency is high, but RDRAM's bandwith spanks SDRAM. For office applications, the P4 SDRAM combo is fine, but for the performance of a P4, I'd just as soon go the RDRAM route, as DDR is kinda pricey right now.
I'd really like to see how you're coming up with the RDRAM killing the P4.
I'd really like to see how you're coming up with the RDRAM killing the P4.
a P4 1.6 with 512mb pc133 sdram.
For gaming it is excellent, but for desktop apps it is appalling.
Only last night I installed my desktopx theme onto it off my other pc (dual p3 1ghz), went online for a game of Tribes 2, and had to come out to unload the desktopx theme as it made Tribes 2 run like a dog!
Also, heres one for you....
I have installed an eicon pci ISDN card into these pc's. On the P4, if I burn a cd (Nero) and am connected to the internet I find I cannot surf anywhere, if I have downloads coming down, they stop! Once the burn has finished, browsing, downloading resumes.
(Last time I buy a ready made pc)
I think I have been spoilt with my duallie
Specs >
Asus CUV4X-D,Dual PIII 1 ghz @133
1.25Gb PC133,1 x 75GXP 30.7GB IBM Deskstar ATA100,1 x Maxtor 740x 60GB ATA133,GTXP 3.02,Gef 2 GTS Pro 32MB DDR (nvidia ref) 23.12 dets
Yamaha 2100s int SCSI CDRW,Adaptec int ScSI card,Acer 52x CDRom,Pioneer 16x DVD A05s,iiyama VM Pro 450 19",MS Intellimouse Explorer USB,MS Sidewinder FF Pro2 USB,MS Sidewinder Gamepad Pro 2 USB,MS Internet Pro KB,USR 56k V.90 Voice/Fax Ext Modem,RatzPad
W2k Sp2 DX8.1 Sec Patches IE 6.0
-----------------------------------------------
P4 1.6 GHz with 400 Mhz Front
Side Bus, 256KB Second Level Cache
3 PCI slots, Graphic upgradable by AGP
4x slots, 4 USBs (2x front / 2x rear),
1 parallel, 2 serial, 2 PS/2
3 FireWire IEEE 1394, 1x front / 2x rear
Front Audio / Video In, 1x Front microphone In
512MB SDRAM at 133MHz
80GB Ultra ATA / 100 hard disk
16x DVD ROM
16x10x40x CD-RW
3,5" floppy disk drive
10 / 100 Mbps network card
6 - channel Dolby Digital Audio Controller
for AC - 3 5.1 Audio
64MB nVidia GeForce3 Ti200 4x AGP 23.12 Dets
Graphics with TV-out / Video - in
56K V.90 PCI DataFax Modem
Microsoft IntelliMouse
PS / 2 Keyboard with Multimedia Hotkeys
Windows XP Home Edition pre - loaded
For gaming it is excellent, but for desktop apps it is appalling.
Only last night I installed my desktopx theme onto it off my other pc (dual p3 1ghz), went online for a game of Tribes 2, and had to come out to unload the desktopx theme as it made Tribes 2 run like a dog!
Also, heres one for you....
I have installed an eicon pci ISDN card into these pc's. On the P4, if I burn a cd (Nero) and am connected to the internet I find I cannot surf anywhere, if I have downloads coming down, they stop! Once the burn has finished, browsing, downloading resumes.
(Last time I buy a ready made pc)
I think I have been spoilt with my duallie
Specs >
Asus CUV4X-D,Dual PIII 1 ghz @133
1.25Gb PC133,1 x 75GXP 30.7GB IBM Deskstar ATA100,1 x Maxtor 740x 60GB ATA133,GTXP 3.02,Gef 2 GTS Pro 32MB DDR (nvidia ref) 23.12 dets
Yamaha 2100s int SCSI CDRW,Adaptec int ScSI card,Acer 52x CDRom,Pioneer 16x DVD A05s,iiyama VM Pro 450 19",MS Intellimouse Explorer USB,MS Sidewinder FF Pro2 USB,MS Sidewinder Gamepad Pro 2 USB,MS Internet Pro KB,USR 56k V.90 Voice/Fax Ext Modem,RatzPad
W2k Sp2 DX8.1 Sec Patches IE 6.0
-----------------------------------------------
P4 1.6 GHz with 400 Mhz Front
Side Bus, 256KB Second Level Cache
3 PCI slots, Graphic upgradable by AGP
4x slots, 4 USBs (2x front / 2x rear),
1 parallel, 2 serial, 2 PS/2
3 FireWire IEEE 1394, 1x front / 2x rear
Front Audio / Video In, 1x Front microphone In
512MB SDRAM at 133MHz
80GB Ultra ATA / 100 hard disk
16x DVD ROM
16x10x40x CD-RW
3,5" floppy disk drive
10 / 100 Mbps network card
6 - channel Dolby Digital Audio Controller
for AC - 3 5.1 Audio
64MB nVidia GeForce3 Ti200 4x AGP 23.12 Dets
Graphics with TV-out / Video - in
56K V.90 PCI DataFax Modem
Microsoft IntelliMouse
PS / 2 Keyboard with Multimedia Hotkeys
Windows XP Home Edition pre - loaded
hmmm rambus kills the performance of the p4? never heard that before, and seeing as ive got 1 i can tell you that its far from slow.
Dosfreak as far as i know your right about that rdram out performing ddr at a certain speed thing. Its shown on tomshardware, where a 2.6/rambus beats a 3.0/ddr
SHS maybe you should go look at some comparasons of sdr/rambus and look at the difference. Sorry if ive mis-understood your post and taken it totally the wrong way
Dosfreak as far as i know your right about that rdram out performing ddr at a certain speed thing. Its shown on tomshardware, where a 2.6/rambus beats a 3.0/ddr
SHS maybe you should go look at some comparasons of sdr/rambus and look at the difference. Sorry if ive mis-understood your post and taken it totally the wrong way
sdram vs rambus 64bit/16bit, 16bit latency is very high the only thing rambus out performing everbody on is memory bandwith benchmarking which not the same as ture memory test, a real memory test show rambus to much slow then PC100 and like point out to all you most benchmarking tools do not full up the memory and real memory test should be done in dos not windows.
Romer has that next rambus chip I think know as PC1000 or some like that it be getting upgrade to 32bit latency
For get Toms Hardware they dosen't know jack ****.
Romer has that next rambus chip I think know as PC1000 or some like that it be getting upgrade to 32bit latency
For get Toms Hardware they dosen't know jack ****.
RDRAM pimp-slaps SDRAM and DDR-DRAM in everything but latency, hence the major desire for DDR makers to go multichannel to catch up with RDRAM's performance in the bandwidth department. Ever notice why the P4's performance climbs with RDRAM? Well, that's it; the P4 gets strangled by memory bottlenecks and just needs faster memory (and more info moving per clock as well) to show its true prowess.
As for the testing, I usually see the bench-marketing apps running synthetic numbers (and RDRAM wins), but I usually look for Photoshop and 3D rendering numbers as my guide. RDRAM generally takes those as well, but I just don't care for RAMBUS in general or their desire to keep the cost of their memory inflated for so long that it killed any real chance for commercial success.
As for the testing, I usually see the bench-marketing apps running synthetic numbers (and RDRAM wins), but I usually look for Photoshop and 3D rendering numbers as my guide. RDRAM generally takes those as well, but I just don't care for RAMBUS in general or their desire to keep the cost of their memory inflated for so long that it killed any real chance for commercial success.
I would have agree 100% not to long ago with you on this clutch.
RAMBUS in general or their desire to keep the cost of their memory inflated for so long that it killed any real chance for commercial success.
But that not the case now at lease not this yrs after all 512 stick of memory only cost as low as $150 to high side $200 depend on where live and if you getting it from local computer store online you can get them as low $122+S/H.
RAMBUS in general or their desire to keep the cost of their memory inflated for so long that it killed any real chance for commercial success.
But that not the case now at lease not this yrs after all 512 stick of memory only cost as low as $150 to high side $200 depend on where live and if you getting it from local computer store online you can get them as low $122+S/H.
Quote:
I would have agree 100% not to long ago with you on this clutch.
RAMBUS in general or their desire to keep the cost of their memory inflated for so long that it killed any real chance for commercial success.
But that not the case now at lease not this yrs after all 512 stick of memory only cost as low as 0 to high side 0 depend on where live and if you getting it from local computer store online you can get them as low 2+S/H.
Absolutely, but when you get a product out to market the *initial* acceptance goes a long way in deciding the fate of the product. RAMBUS was milking the royalties for everything they could get for such a long time, that it just got a bad name. I can see recouping the initial investment over the first 2 or 3 quarters, but they were holding the cost up so high on an already expensive design (the chips have to be really fast to begin with, thus more expensive to make) that acceptance was bound to fizzle. After seeing the benches on the newer PC1033(1050? something like that) bring new life to all the P4s, it will be interesting to see what the price tag is going to be.
I would have agree 100% not to long ago with you on this clutch.
RAMBUS in general or their desire to keep the cost of their memory inflated for so long that it killed any real chance for commercial success.
But that not the case now at lease not this yrs after all 512 stick of memory only cost as low as 0 to high side 0 depend on where live and if you getting it from local computer store online you can get them as low 2+S/H.
Absolutely, but when you get a product out to market the *initial* acceptance goes a long way in deciding the fate of the product. RAMBUS was milking the royalties for everything they could get for such a long time, that it just got a bad name. I can see recouping the initial investment over the first 2 or 3 quarters, but they were holding the cost up so high on an already expensive design (the chips have to be really fast to begin with, thus more expensive to make) that acceptance was bound to fizzle. After seeing the benches on the newer PC1033(1050? something like that) bring new life to all the P4s, it will be interesting to see what the price tag is going to be.