plz....Dungeon Keeper 2 don't run on w2000
i've tried all the way. . . . . . . . dk2 don't wanna run under my win2000. . . . . . . . . . . . plz i've search some patch. . . but nothing. . . . . . . . help meeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!! thx.
i've tried all the way........dk2 don't wanna
run under my win2000.........
...plz i've search some patch...but nothing........help meeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!
thx
run under my win2000.........
...plz i've search some patch...but nothing........help meeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!
thx
Participate on our website and join the conversation
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.
Responses to this topic
This is a known problem. I have tried al sorts of things to get it going.
If you try to run it using Apcompat to fool DK2 into thinking it is running under Win9x, then you get an error about a debugger running, and you must unload before the game will run.
Bullfrog are meant to be working on a patch. The last patch (1.6) was meant to include bump mapping support for the G400, but they bodged it. The next patch (1.7) is meant to fix it, and hopefully introduce Win2k support.
If you try to run it using Apcompat to fool DK2 into thinking it is running under Win9x, then you get an error about a debugger running, and you must unload before the game will run.
Bullfrog are meant to be working on a patch. The last patch (1.6) was meant to include bump mapping support for the G400, but they bodged it. The next patch (1.7) is meant to fix it, and hopefully introduce Win2k support.
This is so true, but how long have we been waiting for the 1.7 patch now?
I'm thinking they are too busy working on DK3.
The 1.7 patch looks like yet another promised yet never appears patch.
I'm thinking they are too busy working on DK3.
The 1.7 patch looks like yet another promised yet never appears patch.
Since I like windows 2000 so much (stability and task manager) I am in on this boycott.
Yup,
I'm up for that one.
Some kind of on-line partition.
Someobody sets out the wording of a latter of partition, everybody can electronically sign it, with e-mail address etc.
Then it could be sent to the company in question.
I'm up for that one.
Some kind of on-line partition.
Someobody sets out the wording of a latter of partition, everybody can electronically sign it, with e-mail address etc.
Then it could be sent to the company in question.