Ron_Jeremy

149 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-09-02

#72515

2002-01-08 09:26

http://www.exactaudiocopy.de/index.html
 
 
It is the best.

0 0

bobbinbrisco

364 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-07-30

OP

#72516

2002-01-09 04:09

thanks, really needed a program like this!
 
this program looks good

0 0

ThC 129

1623 Posts
Location -
Joined 1999-12-06

#72517

2002-01-10 19:56

yeah EAC and lame are the best way to go when encoding into MP3

0 0

danny_t187

1 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-02-10

#72518

2002-02-10 20:58

If your having problems with the protection on a WMA file that's keeping you from converting them I would suggest you go to this site http://wind.prohosting.com/danny187 the prog is called unfck.exe it's only 80kb but it can relieve alot of headaches if you know what i mean
good luck

0 0

bobbinbrisco

364 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-07-30

OP

#72519

2002-02-11 11:07

thanks, it has been a big help

0 0

insaNity

155 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-11-09

#72520

2002-02-12 16:44

but don't you lose quality during re-encoding?
 
I find it better to just get a wma codec for your player...nothing wrong with wma

0 0

parrest

5 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-02-13

#72521

2002-02-13 00:04

That only applies to analog mediums such as tape or vinyl copying. Digital information to different compression methods don't vary in sound quality unless you purposely choose a different compression rate.

0 0

insaNity

155 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-11-09

#72522

2002-02-13 03:51

I dont believe you
 
even saving a .jpg twice will lose quality.

0 0

parrest

5 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-02-13

#72523

2002-02-13 04:02

I'm sorry. I thought we were talking about AUDIO and SOUND. Are we including digital photographs and digital video and other vaguely related mediums as well? I was answering the question about encoding/re-encoding and the simple answer is: no...no sound quality loss.

0 0

insaNity

155 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-11-09

#72524

2002-02-13 08:40

no - I was using it as an example
 
I would like to know how it is possible to encode an mp3 with out losing quality as it is a lossy compression, as in wma

0 0

ThC 129

1623 Posts
Location -
Joined 1999-12-06

#72525

2002-02-13 08:52

Depends really on the encoder, ive seen encoders that lose very little in the encoding process and ive seen other ones, musicmatch for instance that really suck at converting files and not losing quality. It all comes down to the compression logarithm more than anything in the end.

0 0

insaNity

155 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-11-09

#72526

2002-02-13 11:35

you always lose a lot of quality OR get huge files.

0 0