proof that there are stoners working at M$
check this out these graphics that are now part of win2k3 server date all the way back to the xp betas. And the icons in the tray date back to win2k what the phuck. .
check this out
these graphics that are now part of win2k3 server date all the way back to the xp betas. And the icons in the tray date back to win2k
what the phuck.
these graphics that are now part of win2k3 server date all the way back to the xp betas. And the icons in the tray date back to win2k
what the phuck.
Participate on our website and join the conversation
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.
Responses to this topic
my point is that it is sloppy. someone should have noticed this besides me. particularly someone at Microsoft.
ok the screen shot is from server 2003. which does have the ability to run the luna theme however by default it is not installed. and the icons for the things like the network conection have all bee redesigned also. I think that the expample should reflect this.
the taskbar properties window should look more like this
although that is a bit sloppy u get the idea.
although that is a bit sloppy u get the idea.
Well submit it to microsoft as a bug. I'm sure it'll be high on their list to fix.
if it works - why change it - also why confuse people with new icons...
Also - a Server O/S - most admin's could not care less how the icons look - they are more conerned wth the O/S to function - hence why the theme's are off.
Would you prefer a pretty Server O/S - or a working one?
If you want pretty icons - use XP.
Ithink i would prefer MS working on the inner of an O/S as opposed to the pertty outside.
Also - a Server O/S - most admin's could not care less how the icons look - they are more conerned wth the O/S to function - hence why the theme's are off.
Would you prefer a pretty Server O/S - or a working one?
If you want pretty icons - use XP.
Ithink i would prefer MS working on the inner of an O/S as opposed to the pertty outside.
