Quake3 not as fast as it should be
This is a discussion about Quake3 not as fast as it should be in the Windows Games category; Hi, Quake3 is not as fast as it should be! check: 1. 27: 106 fps 1. 17: 107 fps My specs: Win2k SP2 Asus A7V Duron 850Mhz @ 1071Mhz Asus v7700 GeForce2 GTS 32Mb (using Det 12. 90) Micron CAS2 PC133 256Mb Maxtor 30Gb 7200 Help!! Could you please post your timedemos?.
Hi,
Quake3 is not as fast as it should be! check:
1.27: 106 fps
1.17: 107 fps
My specs:
Win2k SP2
Asus A7V
Duron 850Mhz @ 1071Mhz
Asus v7700 GeForce2 GTS 32Mb (using Det 12.90)
Micron CAS2 PC133 256Mb
Maxtor 30Gb 7200
Help!!
Could you please post your timedemos?
Quake3 is not as fast as it should be! check:
1.27: 106 fps
1.17: 107 fps
My specs:
Win2k SP2
Asus A7V
Duron 850Mhz @ 1071Mhz
Asus v7700 GeForce2 GTS 32Mb (using Det 12.90)
Micron CAS2 PC133 256Mb
Maxtor 30Gb 7200
Help!!
Could you please post your timedemos?
Participate in our website and join the conversation
This subject has been archived. New comments and votes cannot be submitted.
Jul 8
Jul 13
0
2 minutes
Responses to this topic
I have a similar setup than yours. What is your setting in quake3? resolution color debth? Any changes on the video card via the control panael like FSAA and antiospotic filtering? I can do a bunch of time deom's but would rather set everything like yours and do it.
OP
quake is set at "normal" 800x600 (color dept is default)
I timedemo demo001 in 1.17, 1.27, but for some reason I now get 114 fps in both demos.
FSAA is off, vsync off, anisotropic is disabled
Look at the score he's getting http://firingsquad.gamers.com/hardware/duron850/images/q3norm800.gif
he's on win98 se, and using 6.31 drivers
I timedemo demo001 in 1.17, 1.27, but for some reason I now get 114 fps in both demos.
FSAA is off, vsync off, anisotropic is disabled
Look at the score he's getting http://firingsquad.gamers.com/hardware/duron850/images/q3norm800.gif
he's on win98 se, and using 6.31 drivers
seem to only be able to play some d34thm4tch demo
on 1.29 I get 129 fps
P3 800 @896Mhz, 384mb pc 133 cl2, Geforce 2 GTS 32mb, Maxtor 40gig 5400rpm ATA 100.
on 1.29 I get 129 fps
P3 800 @896Mhz, 384mb pc 133 cl2, Geforce 2 GTS 32mb, Maxtor 40gig 5400rpm ATA 100.
OP
I get 95fps in 800x600 and 87 fps in 1024 x 768 in that demo. A 35fps difference is a lot, I know quake3 is optimized for p3s but still.
You got win2k installed in ACPI or Standard??
I gotta try reinstalling win2k in standard mode, I'm pretty sure that ACPI shiznit is messing things up, all those devices on IRQ9....
You got win2k installed in ACPI or Standard??
I gotta try reinstalling win2k in standard mode, I'm pretty sure that ACPI shiznit is messing things up, all those devices on IRQ9....
OP
IRQ Number Device
9 Microsoft ACPI-Compliant System
9 NVIDIA GeForce2 GTS/GeForce2 Pro
9 VIA USB Universal Host Controller
9 VIA USB Universal Host Controller
9 SMC EZ Card PCI 10 Adapter (SMC1208)
9 Vortex Multifunction PCI Parent
9 Aureal Vortex 8830 Audio
9 Win2000 Promise Ultra100 IDE Controller (PDC20265)
9 Microsoft ACPI-Compliant System
9 NVIDIA GeForce2 GTS/GeForce2 Pro
9 VIA USB Universal Host Controller
9 VIA USB Universal Host Controller
9 SMC EZ Card PCI 10 Adapter (SMC1208)
9 Vortex Multifunction PCI Parent
9 Aureal Vortex 8830 Audio
9 Win2000 Promise Ultra100 IDE Controller (PDC20265)
I never use ACPI because of a lot of reasons
no offence intended but 1 fps difference?
do you even notice?
do you even notice?
I dont think thats what he means, he means that the overall fps is not as high as other peoples, not the difference between the two versions. Correct me if im wrong
oops ..doh ..
yeah ..mistake by me ..
i gotten use to people talking about driver version = this frame rate
type of stuff
yeah ..mistake by me ..
i gotten use to people talking about driver version = this frame rate
type of stuff
