QuickTime on WinXP...

This is a discussion about QuickTime on WinXP... in the Windows Hardware category; Sorry for posting this here, but I dunno if the other sections gets checked at all. Anyways, I installed QuickTime 5. 0 PRO on RC1, every. mov file is very slow and no audio, I guess QuickTime doesnt work with WinXP atm at all?.

Windows Hardware 9627 This topic was started by ,


data/avatar/default/avatar30.webp

6 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-07-04
Sorry for posting this here, but I dunno if the other sections gets checked at all. Anyways, I installed QuickTime 5.0 PRO on RC1, every .mov file is very slow and no audio, I guess QuickTime doesnt work with WinXP atm at all?

Participate in our website and join the conversation

You already have an account on our website? To log in, use the link provided below.
Login
Create a new user account. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds.
Register
This subject has been archived. New comments and votes cannot be submitted.
Jul 4
Created
Jul 5
Last Response
0
Likes
2 minutes
Read Time
User User User
Users

Responses to this topic


data/avatar/default/avatar16.webp

1623 Posts
Location -
Joined 1999-12-06
i havent had any problems with quicktime in XP. Ive used it since XP was in pre-beta stages and its worked fine.

data/avatar/default/avatar19.webp

38 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-07-05
you bother to run any other movie files in WMP or something just to see that it could be the drivers or something instead and not QuickTime
 
if it's not QuickTime, and it happens in WMP, it's the drivers, just get the win2k versions off of your manufacturer's site for both audio and video

data/avatar/default/avatar30.webp

6 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-07-04
OP
ok But after a day use of WinXP I've come to the conclusion that it sucks ***, I hate the "easy installing" I want to configure stuff myselfe. And its still to "beta" for me. Back to good old Win2K.

data/avatar/default/avatar19.webp

38 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-07-05
and your telling us that...because??? It still configures the same way win2k does, so that excuse isn't even valid, but ok, do what you want.

data/avatar/default/avatar30.webp

6 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-07-04
OP
hey Im entitled to my own opinion however lame it is And I think WinXP is no good at the present stage.

data/avatar/default/avatar16.webp

1623 Posts
Location -
Joined 1999-12-06
'easy installing' uhh i dont know what your talking about. Ive used XP from the begining when the pre-beta 1 builds were out, and as long as my hardware is configured right its always been faster and more responsive than 2k is. Not to mention a lot of the feature upgrades and things. If XP isnt stable for you its most likely due to bad hardware config. Im never going back to 2k, it would be like going from Windows 2k to Windows 3.11. XP has always done what i asked it to and more.