Radeon 9000 Pro
Has anyone bought one? Don't trust benchmarks. Want to upgrade my Radeon VIVO 64DDR and can't afford the puffdaddy 9700. Any opinions? cheers. .
Has anyone bought one?
Don't trust benchmarks. Want to upgrade my Radeon VIVO 64DDR and can't afford the puffdaddy 9700.
Any opinions?
cheers.
Don't trust benchmarks. Want to upgrade my Radeon VIVO 64DDR and can't afford the puffdaddy 9700.
Any opinions?
cheers.
Participate on our website and join the conversation
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.
Responses to this topic
My opinion is nVidia. But ATI has been gaining ground recently. I still don't trust ATI's drivers, nVidia drivers seem to be more compatable/stable than ATI and ATI is just barely starting to have a good card anyhow. With the NV30 just around the bend I could give a crap about what ATI has to offer.
Quote:My suggestion:
Buy it but see if you can return it. Then do a compare between the latest that Nvidia/Matrox/ATI has to offer. Pick which one you like the most but be fair towards's each.
Word
the only problem with that is you will get the best prices online and not in the shop. But you could buy from the shop return it and buy the same thing online. also if you are going the return route make sure you ask if it is for store credit or cash and if there is a restocking fee.
Buy it but see if you can return it. Then do a compare between the latest that Nvidia/Matrox/ATI has to offer. Pick which one you like the most but be fair towards's each.
Word
the only problem with that is you will get the best prices online and not in the shop. But you could buy from the shop return it and buy the same thing online. also if you are going the return route make sure you ask if it is for store credit or cash and if there is a restocking fee.
I do believe the 8500 is a good buy too, I got an 8500 LE and it is quite fast and has great features. In fact recent benchmarks show that it is faster than the 9000 since that card was designed to compete with the Geforce 4 MX. As for ATI drivers, they are good now, they used to suck when I had other ATI cards so thats why I switched to a GF2MX, but with an 8500LE I am quite happy.
Oh I'm sure the NV30 will beat ATI's current offering.
However you have to ask - at what price?
NVidia release cards and charge a fortune for them.
Your best bet maybe to wait until the NV30 is released (2003 by the looks of things) and then pick up a GF4 at a knock-down price.
I'm not 100% convinced by ATI's drivers, but once the card becomes more widely available, especially here in the UK I'll take a very close look at it.
Personally for work I'm buying in 6 of the nice new Matrox cards.
Sure they do not offer the sheer 3D performance that ATI & NVidia offer, but you've gotta love that 2D and general image quality.
However you have to ask - at what price?
NVidia release cards and charge a fortune for them.
Your best bet maybe to wait until the NV30 is released (2003 by the looks of things) and then pick up a GF4 at a knock-down price.
I'm not 100% convinced by ATI's drivers, but once the card becomes more widely available, especially here in the UK I'll take a very close look at it.
Personally for work I'm buying in 6 of the nice new Matrox cards.
Sure they do not offer the sheer 3D performance that ATI & NVidia offer, but you've gotta love that 2D and general image quality.
I like nVidia cause they have something for everyone. None of their cards are bad and you get the same drivers for all. I don't buy nVidias latest shit cause I am not some crazy gammer. I will soon be buying a gf4mx to get some mad cheap dual head and decent ogl performance.
The Radeon 9000 is pretty much on par with the 8500 currently. Drivers may improve it in the future, however. As far as ATI's drivers sucking, that's no longer a very valid argument. I was on the same fence as Four and Twenty, but I put my money where my mouth was and found the 8500 to be very nice. ATI has done a massive improvement in the driver arena. They are 100 times a better company then they were a year ago.
i see games now that are marked
designed on nVidia to be played on nVidia
i also still see post on lots of board with varios games producing blank or garbled screens when using ATI so I don't think you can say 100% that ATIs driver issues are over and done. All companys have some problems nVidia just has a lot less kinda like Intel. The big machines are where they are at for a reason. MS NVIDIA and INTEL kick ass and they raise the bar for the industry. ATI is reminding me a lot of AMD right now. Also ATI's new cards don't meet AGP spec what kinda shit is that?
designed on nVidia to be played on nVidia
i also still see post on lots of board with varios games producing blank or garbled screens when using ATI so I don't think you can say 100% that ATIs driver issues are over and done. All companys have some problems nVidia just has a lot less kinda like Intel. The big machines are where they are at for a reason. MS NVIDIA and INTEL kick ass and they raise the bar for the industry. ATI is reminding me a lot of AMD right now. Also ATI's new cards don't meet AGP spec what kinda shit is that?
Cheers.
I bought one. Thanks for the input.
Price was just too good to pass. $140 (Canadian/ equals $20 US - ha )
Not too much performance gain from my Radeon VIVO64DDR; benefits are Smartshading - better T&L.
One thing have to mention: clarity.....Crap is it clear. Used it on my Samsung 950P 19" beautiful pic.
Drivers are stable.....video out to TV Res is same as desktop.
I'm Canadian so we tend to cheer on ATI for being a local superstar....but no more "just because it's Canadian" it is sweet on it's own merit.
I bought one. Thanks for the input.
Price was just too good to pass. $140 (Canadian/ equals $20 US - ha )
Not too much performance gain from my Radeon VIVO64DDR; benefits are Smartshading - better T&L.
One thing have to mention: clarity.....Crap is it clear. Used it on my Samsung 950P 19" beautiful pic.
Drivers are stable.....video out to TV Res is same as desktop.
I'm Canadian so we tend to cheer on ATI for being a local superstar....but no more "just because it's Canadian" it is sweet on it's own merit.
I am glad it is working well for ya
I hadn't thought of where ATI came from b4
never crossed my mind
I hadn't thought of where ATI came from b4
never crossed my mind
im thinking bout getting a ati 9000 pro 128mb card...just curious as to whether it supports agp 8x or not...i had seen on some sites like http://www.tomshardware.com that it does support 2x 4x and is compatible with 8x....does that mean it runs at 8x on a 8x mainboard?? one thing that is making me lean towards the 9000 pro is that it has pixel shader 1.1 and vertex shader 1.4 and full support for directx 8.1 where as the nvidia gf4 4200 only has pixel shader 1.3 and directx 8.0 support and as i have seen in prices..the 9000 pro is $100 cheaper then a gf 4 4200....
I will say once again, myself, or my uncle have NEVER had any dirver related issue with ATI's cards. I would have gotten an ATI aiw 8500 128mb card but could not find them anywhere, so i got a g4 4600 ultra.
And hopefully by next year ATi will have their 256mb versions out (as in the specs it says support for 128mb or 256mb)
i would take ATi any day over Nvidia - Nvidia does have a "faster" driver system going, but again @ the same time, why does a company have to release drivers SO often?
ATI may not release them as often because they do not need to? Yet at the same time, these means that people who are having issues that are driver related have to wait.
Anyways, just my 2 cents' worth.
Either way, i look @ the specs of each card, and compare them both, then chekc out sites that have done "fair" benchmarks, and check forums on what people who have the cards think, that is the best way to go,.
Diff, people will have Diff. experiences with cards - mine for both nvidia and ATi have been good (although i have had more B.S.O.D with nividia cards (tnt2 riva /;g4 4600 ultra) then i have ever had with ATI (never had any).
And hopefully by next year ATi will have their 256mb versions out (as in the specs it says support for 128mb or 256mb)
i would take ATi any day over Nvidia - Nvidia does have a "faster" driver system going, but again @ the same time, why does a company have to release drivers SO often?
ATI may not release them as often because they do not need to? Yet at the same time, these means that people who are having issues that are driver related have to wait.
Anyways, just my 2 cents' worth.
Either way, i look @ the specs of each card, and compare them both, then chekc out sites that have done "fair" benchmarks, and check forums on what people who have the cards think, that is the best way to go,.
Diff, people will have Diff. experiences with cards - mine for both nvidia and ATi have been good (although i have had more B.S.O.D with nividia cards (tnt2 riva /;g4 4600 ultra) then i have ever had with ATI (never had any).
Quote:i would take ATi any day over Nvidia - Nvidia does have a "faster" driver system going, but again @ the same time, why does a company have to release drivers SO often?
Nvidia doesn't HAVE TO release any driver updates. All they are REQUIRED to do is include drivers with the hardware. New drivers that boost performance simply retain a customer base, IMO. And hey, free performance upgrades are great. When was the last time your auto dealer offered you a real free performance upgrade?
Nvidia doesn't HAVE TO release any driver updates. All they are REQUIRED to do is include drivers with the hardware. New drivers that boost performance simply retain a customer base, IMO. And hey, free performance upgrades are great. When was the last time your auto dealer offered you a real free performance upgrade?
i like nvidia they r a good company who will be around for a long time due to excellent products blah blah blah.,..one thing that bugs me bout them is they release a new set of drivers say 30.82 and were ment to see an proformance boost of 25% at least....well im still waiting for that to happen...been waiting since around the time i bought my nvidia card back when driver versions were around 21.83....if anything i think nvidia drivers r going backwards in proformance...DET 30.00 was ment to be the best thing that nvidia ever put out...what a load of crap. i know i only have a shitty tnt2 m64 pci card..and the most i get on 3dmark 2001 is around 700 on a good day...thats with the new drivers 30.82 with the older drivers like 21.83 i got at least 900....just goes to show new drivers arent always a good thing.
It's no secret that new drivers are optimized for newer hardware, Tom's had a review of driver versions for different cards, and the conclusion was that the drivers circa the era of the card are usually best. And FYI, it was the Detonator 40's that are supposed to add 25% performance gain... Yes, they're still in beta, and no, that doesn't mean that you'll get an extra 30FPS in Quake 3 on your TNT...
^^^^
exactly, in 3dmark..lol - which u all know does not mean SHIET!
exactly, in 3dmark..lol - which u all know does not mean SHIET!
