Want "WICKED-FAST" Disks? Check it...
Originally posted by Alec§taar: Quote:yellowish barsThey look green to me 8) Quote:It's making my hard disks respond nearly as fast as my CENATEK RocketDrive 2gb unit (which scores an unreal 655mb/sec cached or uncached typically) I have a deep trust in the information you provide APK, but I think that must be a sl ...
Originally posted by Alec§taar:
Quote:yellowish barsThey look green to me 8)
Quote:It's making my hard disks respond nearly as fast as my CENATEK "RocketDrive" 2gb unit (which scores an unreal 655mb/sec cached or uncached typically)
I have a deep trust in the information you provide APK, but I think that must be a slight exaggeration.
Define 'nearly as fast'....
Quote:yellowish barsThey look green to me 8)
Quote:It's making my hard disks respond nearly as fast as my CENATEK "RocketDrive" 2gb unit (which scores an unreal 655mb/sec cached or uncached typically)
I have a deep trust in the information you provide APK, but I think that must be a slight exaggeration.
Define 'nearly as fast'....
Participate on our website and join the conversation
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.
Responses to this topic
My issue is that I really can't see spending about $300 on a caching app/driver no matter what it did for me.
I really think they need to produce a desktop edition for the end user and optimize it for gaming
I can tell you that many of us hard core gamers would like to get better performance out of our rigs but not at that kind of cash
I would really like to see how this app runs on standard 7200 SATA drives in a RAID Zero array
I really think they need to produce a desktop edition for the end user and optimize it for gaming
I can tell you that many of us hard core gamers would like to get better performance out of our rigs but not at that kind of cash
I would really like to see how this app runs on standard 7200 SATA drives in a RAID Zero array
@ apk
i got curious about tweaking my 2000 system.harddisk performance is very important for things like video-or audio editing what i'm doing most of my free time.
so i don't know.what's the disadvantage of such programs like supercache except the need for lots of ram.as i understood these kind of programs are made for server systems but thinking of them as high performance systems, maybe it neither would be wrong for my editing purposes at my little workstation, although i should get some extra ram and a second harddisk first.
you see that i'm spending a lot of time here atm, but it's just too interesting...
phil
p.s. you mentioned that you used WinTune97 for the benchmark test, so i guess you ran it on another Win9x networked-system during test, no ? i'm asking because i never did that and i don't know anything about the best procedure for doing it.
i got curious about tweaking my 2000 system.harddisk performance is very important for things like video-or audio editing what i'm doing most of my free time.
so i don't know.what's the disadvantage of such programs like supercache except the need for lots of ram.as i understood these kind of programs are made for server systems but thinking of them as high performance systems, maybe it neither would be wrong for my editing purposes at my little workstation, although i should get some extra ram and a second harddisk first.
you see that i'm spending a lot of time here atm, but it's just too interesting...
phil
p.s. you mentioned that you used WinTune97 for the benchmark test, so i guess you ran it on another Win9x networked-system during test, no ? i'm asking because i never did that and i don't know anything about the best procedure for doing it.
im gonna stick with scsi and scsi raid's until
we get past this whole magnetic media thingy
yay solid state hard drives!
we get past this whole magnetic media thingy
yay solid state hard drives!
