WDM and CL
I read this post from SHS over at creative live newsgroup: No it not a mistake Here the diff is NT4 & Win98 base off LEGACY DRV But Win2000 is diff set of drv call WDM (Windows Driver Model). From what i was told.
I read this post from SHS over at creative live newsgroup:
--------------------
No it not a mistake
Here the diff is NT4 & Win98 base off LEGACY DRV
But Win2000 is diff set of drv call WDM (Windows Driver Model).
From what i was told.
1: Win2k DX7 is not support at this time,
so no Communication is made to Kernel CSA Library,
WDM CODEC Class Device Drv.
2: This where LW4 come in so I was told I guest we have wait
& see, anyway the LW4 is for WinME & Win2000.
----------------
I didn't understand much of number 1, is he saying CL don't properly support DX7 accelleration in win2k?
--------------------
No it not a mistake
Here the diff is NT4 & Win98 base off LEGACY DRV
But Win2000 is diff set of drv call WDM (Windows Driver Model).
From what i was told.
1: Win2k DX7 is not support at this time,
so no Communication is made to Kernel CSA Library,
WDM CODEC Class Device Drv.
2: This where LW4 come in so I was told I guest we have wait
& see, anyway the LW4 is for WinME & Win2000.
----------------
I didn't understand much of number 1, is he saying CL don't properly support DX7 accelleration in win2k?
Participate on our website and join the conversation
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.
Responses to this topic
AC3 Passthrough? You mean if CL correctly developed their drivers to support win2k's DX7 in the correct way, they would be able to make AC3 passthrough possible?
Ah, so it was DX7 all the time then... till now I was sure it was win2k driver module and it needed an update with SP.
