What tape backup should I get?

We are going to have a RAID 1 config. with 2 73GB hard drives. What type of tape drive would you guys recommend? Thanks in advance. Matt. .

Windows Hardware 9627 This topic was started by ,


data/avatar/default/avatar14.webp

64 Posts
Location -
Joined 2004-10-13
We are going to have a RAID 1 config. with 2 73GB hard drives. What type of tape drive would you guys recommend?
 
Thanks in advance.
 
Matt.

Participate on our website and join the conversation

You have already an account on our website? Use the link below to login.
Login
Create a new user account. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds.
Register
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.

Responses to this topic


data/avatar/default/avatar05.webp

748 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-05-21
Well, it all depends on how much you're willing to spend, and how much of that 73Gb you class as "essential" data.
 
Rgds
AndyF

data/avatar/default/avatar14.webp

64 Posts
Location -
Joined 2004-10-13
OP
Sorry, I suppose I should have been more specific. My main question is whether to get a 40/80 or an 80/160, and what exactly these designations mean. Thanks.
 
 

data/avatar/default/avatar39.webp

1457 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-12-18
The designation 40/80 is the size that the tape will backup normally/(or)compressed. Depending on the software and the OS when data is read off the hard drive and stored on the tape, you can do a one to one backup or a compressed backup. Depending on the files the compression will be greater, for example, with databases and some .exe's and will be almost negligible with .jpegs and most graphic files since they are already pretty well compressed.
 
Go for the larger tapes. In the old days when you had to format those things, you could spend a day doing nothing but that. Backing up to tape is a physical process and so despite advances, these will still take time. Despite the fact that you can do full backups at night, somebody has to swap out tapes. While they can be set to make only the most recent changes, you will soon learn to basically dedicate certain tapes for certain drives or folders. Despite the fact that it almost doubles the time always allow verification.
 
I have just one question, why did you make your drive Raid1? While it takes three drives, Raid5 might be the better way to go if your data is that important that you want to store it on tape.

data/avatar/default/avatar21.webp

6 Posts
Location -
Joined 2004-10-26
It really depends on what your pocketbook can tollerate. DLT prices are falling because it is an older, but very viable technology. A DLT8000 drive is about $1300 street and the DLTIV tapes are about $30/ea.

data/avatar/default/avatar35.webp

2172 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-08-26
I use 100/200GB LTO media here at work, and at the time when it was purchased (1.5 years ago, +/-) it seemed that would be sufficient for several years. However, they are already being used at max capacity, and I am having to resort to other options (SAN, etc.). The point being, never assume that just because the backup media is about the size you need now, that it will suit your needs in the future. Databases grow and grow, and so do all the related mission-critical files and documents.
 
Backup hardware can be expensive, but invest wisely, and you will not need to replace it for several years.
 
PS: I just read an announcement yesterday (I forget the details to be honest) that a company in Japan is coming to market with a 500GB LTO tape. Could be good news if the price is right when it comes stateside. It may have been either Sony or Fujitsu, really don't recall, sorry.