APK,
 
>>* "Accept NO substitute" as the saying goes... nothing, even comes close to this disk!
<<
 
How about SSD (Solid State Disks)?
 

While, yes, SCSI is faster, do you really need SCSI?
If you need the fastest, I hope you have deep pockets sir. Cheap and SCSI aren't words I'd usually use in reference to hard drives.
Let's put it this way: I just got a pair of IBM 60GXP 40GB 7200RPM ATA100 drives for $190 + shipping. You try to get SCSI for that price.
 
I'm not discouraging SCSI, but for gaming I don't know if that's necessary. If you have the money, hell yeah! GO FOR IT!!!!!

SCSI eats less CPU cycles, that's for sure. But Im sorry, I wouldn't spend my money on SCSI.

SCSI isn't about speed, its about bandwidth. For a games machine go IDE - its more then enough.

True, SCSI is really intended for intense bandwidth and less CPU usage ideal for high class workstations. You can get more space and more than 1 hard disk than the price of 1 SCSI drive + controller. Its a really expensive option.

thats pretty much what i thought. a friend was just telling me that he was gonna get a SCSI machine (which would be a gaming machine), and I told him to just stick w/ata.
 
for servers, however, thats a different story...
 
thanks for all the replies!

Mmmm:D 2 of them in RAID 0. Do you know how much crap you could store on that.
Do you know I have yet to fill up a 20GB hard drive, yet I have way more than that on both machines?