Will XP replace 2000?
I have just passed the NT 4. 0 Workstation test (just before the deadline) and I am about to start on the 2000 track. The people at this forum seem to know quite a bit about XP & I am wondering if I am doing the right thing by getting a full MCSE in 2000, or should I just get a MCP in 2000 & wait for the XP certifi ...
I have just passed the NT 4.0 Workstation test (just before the deadline) and I am about to start on the 2000 track. The people at this forum seem to know quite a bit about XP & I am wondering if I am doing the right thing by getting a full MCSE in 2000, or should I just get a MCP in 2000 & wait for the XP certification tests to come out? Does anyone think that XP will eventually become a full replacement for 2000?
So far I have an A+, CNA, and a MCP in NT 4.0.
------------------
Athlon 700 @ 698
Epox 7kxa
256Mb PC133
Hercules Prophet 32Mb DDR
Sound Blaster X-Gamer
Pioneer 16x DVD
HP 9100i CD-RW
2-30gig 7200RPM WD HD
ViewSonic PF790 19"
Win98SE
Full Tower
So far I have an A+, CNA, and a MCP in NT 4.0.
------------------
Athlon 700 @ 698
Epox 7kxa
256Mb PC133
Hercules Prophet 32Mb DDR
Sound Blaster X-Gamer
Pioneer 16x DVD
HP 9100i CD-RW
2-30gig 7200RPM WD HD
ViewSonic PF790 19"
Win98SE
Full Tower
Participate on our website and join the conversation
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.
Responses to this topic
mine is general OS beta.
I have had pro
2250
2296
2410
2416
2428
2250
2296
2410
2416
2428
that is the most ****ing bullshit thing
arg why the **** do they have to do that?
but then againg those who are gonna run smp might as well run pro
arg why the **** do they have to do that?
but then againg those who are gonna run smp might as well run pro
Average home user who would have bought WinME 6 months ago and Win98 a year ago are not going to have dual CPU's in their system.
Personal edition of WinXP is exactly what they need.
Cheapest version, made nice and simple and no support for a 2nd CPU.
If your using two CPU's on your system then you will be using Professional, so OK you have to, but even if Personal did support 2 CPU's you wouldn't be able to cope with the 'dumbed down' version of this OS.
Personal edition of WinXP is exactly what they need.
Cheapest version, made nice and simple and no support for a 2nd CPU.
If your using two CPU's on your system then you will be using Professional, so OK you have to, but even if Personal did support 2 CPU's you wouldn't be able to cope with the 'dumbed down' version of this OS.
Damn why don't they ask people what they want in a os and put it all together
