Win2k AS: Poor Performance
I just built a new server for our office. Specs: 1ghz KT7-Raid 3 30 IBM ATA-100 256 Generic Ram I am just not satisfied with the performace of this box. I have a similar box running 2000 pro and it flies.
I just built a new server for our office. Specs:
1ghz
KT7-Raid
3 30 IBM ATA-100
256 Generic Ram
I am just not satisfied with the performace of this box. I have a similar box running 2000 pro and it flies.
HD Tach scores are horribly low, but they are low on both systems.
15 ms access time
30 read
On my ME box I get 8 ms access time and 100 mbs read.
I have service pack 1 installed. I have not installed the VIA 4-in-1 patch on this new install. I installed the Ultra-ATA last install and it really really tanked HD performance.
Any Idea's?
1ghz
KT7-Raid
3 30 IBM ATA-100
256 Generic Ram
I am just not satisfied with the performace of this box. I have a similar box running 2000 pro and it flies.
HD Tach scores are horribly low, but they are low on both systems.
15 ms access time
30 read
On my ME box I get 8 ms access time and 100 mbs read.
I have service pack 1 installed. I have not installed the VIA 4-in-1 patch on this new install. I installed the Ultra-ATA last install and it really really tanked HD performance.
Any Idea's?
Participate on our website and join the conversation
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.
Responses to this topic
Servers are generally not meant to be used as desktop systems. How is it performing in its designated duties? Is it serving files well? IIS working well? Running any databases on it? I have AS running on my server at home, and it poor desktop performance, but flies in terminal services and Exchange. I will be putting SQL2K on it along with SMS 2.0 soon to test it for deployment at the office, and I bet it will do that fine too.
Bear in mind that it has many more services running in default trim, and if you feel the need to bring its performance up, you may want to look at stopping/disabling any extraneous entries. Some people install RIS by default, and that is a bear of its own.
------------------
Regards,
clutch
Bear in mind that it has many more services running in default trim, and if you feel the need to bring its performance up, you may want to look at stopping/disabling any extraneous entries. Some people install RIS by default, and that is a bear of its own.
------------------
Regards,
clutch
I have found that IDE RAID is not all it cracked up to be speedwise. It can show some improvement for some operations, but I often see speed with a single drive doing better. I would recommend a visit to the forum on www.storagereview.com where IDE vs SCSI and raid performance are really studied and discussed well.
The bottom line is if you want just blazing hard disk speed, you can't beat a 15K/rpm SCSI hard drive
The bottom line is if you want just blazing hard disk speed, you can't beat a 15K/rpm SCSI hard drive
I run Windows 2000 Adv. Server on my home computer and I don't have any performance problems, it runs hust as fast as Win2k Pro on an Athlon @ 864 MHz, 256 Mb RAM...
I think the reason that your computer is so slow in regular desktop applications is that Win2k Server is optimized for background services by default, to change this right click on 'My Computer' and select 'properties' and the 'Advanced' tab, then open the 'Performance' dialog. There you can change optimization mode, either applications or background services...
[This message has been edited by Marchuz^ (edited 27 March 2001).]
I think the reason that your computer is so slow in regular desktop applications is that Win2k Server is optimized for background services by default, to change this right click on 'My Computer' and select 'properties' and the 'Advanced' tab, then open the 'Performance' dialog. There you can change optimization mode, either applications or background services...
[This message has been edited by Marchuz^ (edited 27 March 2001).]
