win2k competing with XP?
This is a discussion about win2k competing with XP? in the Windows Software category; i heard that some ppl prefer to wait for a service pack or two before even considering a switch. since 2k has 2 SPs and XP has none, wouldn't win2k be a preferable choice (i wonder if that's why MS is threatening to jack up the prices for those who are too slow to upgrade the second it comes out)?.
i heard that some ppl prefer to wait for a service pack or two before even considering a switch. since 2k has 2 SPs and XP has none, wouldn't win2k be a preferable choice (i wonder if that's why MS is threatening to jack up the prices for those who are too slow to upgrade the second it comes out)?
Participate in our website and join the conversation
This subject has been archived. New comments and votes cannot be submitted.
Aug 30
Aug 30
0
1 minute
Responses to this topic
Of course if ppl don't buy XP, WTF is MS gonna do about it? Nothing!!!
Unless they want to piss off a lot of ppl...and I mean more than the Product activation has.
Unless they want to piss off a lot of ppl...and I mean more than the Product activation has.
In the Corporate sector it's usually SP1 they wait for. Heck, I know people still waiting for SP3 to install 2000! 8) 8) These are the paranoid ones tho.
