Windows 2000 and Windows 98 with 512 MB RAM

This is a discussion about Windows 2000 and Windows 98 with 512 MB RAM in the Windows Hardware category; I just reinstalled a dual boot with Win2k and Win98, getting rid of a buggy WinME in the process. However, I noticed that when I boot Win98 and go to device manager, it says I have only 511. 0 MB RAM? I know I have 512 and WinME used to show this and Win2k shows my memory to be 512 but it is listed in KB.

Windows Hardware 9627 This topic was started by ,


data/avatar/default/avatar15.webp

1047 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-04-17
I just reinstalled a dual boot with Win2k and Win98, getting rid of a buggy WinME in the process. However, I noticed that when I boot Win98 and go to device manager, it says I have only 511.0 MB RAM? I know I have 512 and WinME used to show this and Win2k shows my memory to be 512 but it is listed in KB. My motherboard says I have 512 too, when the system starts it counts to 524 288 KB. Is this just a Win98 thingy that it won't count up to 512 since it can't use more memory than that? I checked to see if some sort of TSR is loaded at startup but there isn't and I also removed every DIMM and plugged each one in separately and they all said either 128 or 256 or 384 correctly, only with 512 i get 511. I even rearranged my DIMMs around and all combinations of 512 give 511 in Win98. My DIMMs are like this
- Have 3 DIMMS slots all are filled
1 - 128 MB PC133
2 - 128 MB PC133
3- 256 MB PC133

Participate in our website and join the conversation

You already have an account on our website? To log in, use the link provided below.
Login
Create a new user account. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds.
Register
This subject has been archived. New comments and votes cannot be submitted.
Jul 28
Created
Aug 6
Last Response
0
Likes
3 minutes
Read Time
User User User User User
Users

Responses to this topic


data/avatar/default/avatar13.webp

5 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-07-03
So what if it says 511 instead of 512? Is it really that big of a difference?

data/avatar/default/avatar15.webp

1047 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-04-17
OP
Not really, but it does bug me, anybody else have Win98 and have 512 megs of RAM?

data/avatar/default/avatar19.webp

118 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-05-15
Well...do you know about your video architecture? is it shared?

data/avatar/default/avatar25.webp

1297 Posts
Location -
Joined 1999-07-16
Don't worry about pmistry Win98 thur WinME have as memory limits
Beside you should have this way
1 - 256 MB PC133
2 - 128 MB PC133
3- 128 MB PC133

data/avatar/default/avatar15.webp

1047 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-04-17
OP
Thanks for the tip SHS, I'll move my larger DIMM to the first slot.

data/avatar/default/avatar15.webp

1047 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-04-17
OP
I don't have shared video memory, I just have a GeForce 2 MX with 32 MB and an SB Live Value all working on an Asus K7V with BIOS 1007.

data/avatar/default/avatar16.webp

364 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-07-30
i read that if u r running win98 and u already have 128Mb RAM then having any more than that will not make ANY difference- but it would really benefit win2k

data/avatar/default/avatar19.webp

38 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-07-05
check your bios for that 14-15 MB Memory Hole thing (I think that's what it's called), if it's on, turn it off, disabled it.

data/avatar/default/avatar15.webp

1047 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-04-17
OP
It doesn't matter anymore simply put Win98 won't recognize the 1 meg, probably due to a VIA chipset issue or the OS itself. If I use WinME it reads 512, if I use Win95B it is still saying 511. Microsoft's 9x OSes are almost eliminated, XP all the way!