Windows 2000 Server and processor toss-up

OK, this might seem like a stupid question but bare with me. I have a Windows 2000 Server running on a Pentium 233MMX (remember those?) with 256MB RAM and a whopping buttload of services. I am pretty satisfied with it's performance considering the load it's under, but I do have a Celeron 300a and a Celeron 400 layi ...

Windows Hardware 9627 This topic was started by ,


data/avatar/default/avatar11.webp

11 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-03-14
OK, this might seem like a stupid question but bare with me.
 
I have a Windows 2000 Server running on a Pentium 233MMX (remember those?) with 256MB RAM and a whopping buttload of services.
 
I am pretty satisfied with it's performance considering the load it's under, but I do have a Celeron 300a and a Celeron 400 laying around that I could use instead.
 
Should I change the server out and put it on a machine with one of the other processors? Yes, they might have a higher clock rate but I don't know how the Celerons will handle server responsibilities - what do you guys think?
 
 
 
------------------
- Neb

Participate on our website and join the conversation

You have already an account on our website? Use the link below to login.
Login
Create a new user account. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds.
Register
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.

Responses to this topic


data/avatar/default/avatar19.webp

3857 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-03-29
I ran NT4 Server on a celeron 300a@450, and both NT4 Server/Win2K AS on a celeron 333 before. All worked fine, even with AD. It was a small network, but they worked.
 
------------------
Regards,
 
clutch