Windows 2000 SP2
just wondering what the post on the main site means: Windows 2000 Service Pack 2 Posted Friday, May 11, 2001 Microsoft has released Service Pack 2 for Windows 2000 to beta testers of its windows update site.
just wondering what the post on the main site means:
"
Windows 2000 Service Pack 2 Posted Friday, May 11, 2001
Microsoft has released Service Pack 2 for Windows 2000 to beta testers of its windows update site. Thanks Erik.
"
Does this mean it is finished and they are releasing it but only to beta testers at the moment? or does it mean there is just another build of it?
Tom
"
Windows 2000 Service Pack 2 Posted Friday, May 11, 2001
Microsoft has released Service Pack 2 for Windows 2000 to beta testers of its windows update site. Thanks Erik.
"
Does this mean it is finished and they are releasing it but only to beta testers at the moment? or does it mean there is just another build of it?
Tom
Participate on our website and join the conversation
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.
Responses to this topic
Sp2 is mostly bug fixes it will be in no way shape or form as good as XP will be in terms of 3dmarks when it is finished. I know some of the fixes include better application compatability support, the VIA chipset fix the AMD fix, fixed ATA-100 support. Im sure someone will post the list of fixes pretty soon.
The list of fixes with SP2 is big, please nobody post it here, just post a link - I hate scrolling!!
No SP2 does not make Win2k like XP.
XP is 95% Win2k anyway, but as with all Service Packs it fixes bugs and issues missing from the initial release.
Before anybody asks, no you don't need to install SP1 first, SP2 contains all the fixes.
Also, before the usual LINUX people jump in quoting the many thousands of 'bugs' fixed with SP2, the full list of fixes includes such things as:
'Spelling mistakes in help files'
'Missing punctuation in readme files'
Each of those fixes is clased as a single fix by Microsoft.
No SP2 does not make Win2k like XP.
XP is 95% Win2k anyway, but as with all Service Packs it fixes bugs and issues missing from the initial release.
Before anybody asks, no you don't need to install SP1 first, SP2 contains all the fixes.
Also, before the usual LINUX people jump in quoting the many thousands of 'bugs' fixed with SP2, the full list of fixes includes such things as:
'Spelling mistakes in help files'
'Missing punctuation in readme files'
Each of those fixes is clased as a single fix by Microsoft.
I have SP2 installed for about 5 hours now, and my machine is still alive and well.
The ATA100 support is definitley fixed now, and the system feels a bit more responsive than before. However, I havn't been able to test the gaming performance (I use Windows ME for that).
The ATA100 support is definitley fixed now, and the system feels a bit more responsive than before. However, I havn't been able to test the gaming performance (I use Windows ME for that).
Blade Runner, good thing for pointing that out. I hate Linux zealots, because about the raving on how good Linux is. Sure it may be good, but the apps I want to run are always on Windows, and we're lucky if we see the full playable version of it on Linux. Plus, Linux is not going to get very far if it cant penetrate the home market.
End rant.
Okay, back to the topic: So this is the final version of SP2?
Thanx in advance!
End rant.
Okay, back to the topic: So this is the final version of SP2?
Thanx in advance!
Hey kaiyin
You said that ATA100 is working now, but how can you tell?
I have an ATA100 Maxtor 30gig on my Abit KT7-A Raid and it still runs slower than my main disk which is UDMA 66.
I tried running HD Tach and Sisoft Sandra and they both reported it being damned slow.
In the RAID Array setup, its selected as UDMA Mode 5.
Funny thing I found tho was that using the VIA IDE driver (Which I have since taken off) caused this particular drive to run even slower.
So, how can one tell if ATA100 is actually working?
Also gonna go check out new drivers for the Hipoint System and RAID array. That might work too.
Specs:
Athlon T/Bird 1.2Ghz
Abit KT7-A RAID
Geforce 2 GTS 32Mb (12.00 Detontors)
SB Live
... and loads of other stuff!
Homer
You said that ATA100 is working now, but how can you tell?
I have an ATA100 Maxtor 30gig on my Abit KT7-A Raid and it still runs slower than my main disk which is UDMA 66.
I tried running HD Tach and Sisoft Sandra and they both reported it being damned slow.
In the RAID Array setup, its selected as UDMA Mode 5.
Funny thing I found tho was that using the VIA IDE driver (Which I have since taken off) caused this particular drive to run even slower.
So, how can one tell if ATA100 is actually working?
Also gonna go check out new drivers for the Hipoint System and RAID array. That might work too.
Specs:
Athlon T/Bird 1.2Ghz
Abit KT7-A RAID
Geforce 2 GTS 32Mb (12.00 Detontors)
SB Live
... and loads of other stuff!
Homer
When I talk about Linux Zealots--Im referring to those who like any other OS zealot(Windows, Mac, BeOS) that refuse to see the problems facing that OS, and think that every other OS is totally inferior. Plus, it seems that certain memebers of the Linux community compare Linux to Windows 98 as far as stability. If they would look at all the other WinOS's(Win2k and XP) they would see that the Windows crashing is not as common. I think the OS that is used depends in part on what apps youre running. If all I did was graphics, Id have a mac. I like Linux, but even the mac has been around a bit longer. Unfortunately, there not a whole lot of Linux apps you can get right off the shelves. I think the biggest issue facing Linux is getting onto the home desktop market. If Linux got there that would be sweet.
Linux is cool, but unfortunately, the lack of drivers and apps out for it is a major issue too.
The latest offerings by MS have made me at least consider Linux as an option.
I love the fact that with Linux, you get a ton of apps, which helps to offset the fact that there's not much out there for it. Yes, I use KDE...when I have it installed. I think Im gonna get SuSE 7.0 Professional sometime, because Mandrake isnt good for gaming and stuff. Pluse SuSE is supposed to have excellent driver support.
I wish that with the OS's there could be a variety of files that could be shared without having to have 3rd party software. Like have a hybrid cd for Windows and Linux of the same game. I know theres a file for UT for Linux that you can download and it will install the UT game off the UT disc for Windows. That is good, because it seems that most of the Linux community has had enough of MS, and probably still have their Windows apps discs laying around. Now why cant there be more of that universally?
Linux is cool, but unfortunately, the lack of drivers and apps out for it is a major issue too.
The latest offerings by MS have made me at least consider Linux as an option.
I love the fact that with Linux, you get a ton of apps, which helps to offset the fact that there's not much out there for it. Yes, I use KDE...when I have it installed. I think Im gonna get SuSE 7.0 Professional sometime, because Mandrake isnt good for gaming and stuff. Pluse SuSE is supposed to have excellent driver support.
I wish that with the OS's there could be a variety of files that could be shared without having to have 3rd party software. Like have a hybrid cd for Windows and Linux of the same game. I know theres a file for UT for Linux that you can download and it will install the UT game off the UT disc for Windows. That is good, because it seems that most of the Linux community has had enough of MS, and probably still have their Windows apps discs laying around. Now why cant there be more of that universally?
I could not agree more Brian.
I just had to pull you up on it, I figured some linux lover would sniff it.
I use Linux.
I wish so bad that it didn't suck. But it does. it is stable. More stable then Microsoft could ever imagine. But thats because of the programs written for it, as much as it is for the OS itself.
And the dude who said it did about as much as your c64?
Haha. You're not far off, but then so does windows.
Linux is just to badly organised for my liking. Something is wrong with it, I'm just not sure what.
" Linux is like a semen sandwich. Supposed to be good for you, but it tastes like sh1t "
I just had to pull you up on it, I figured some linux lover would sniff it.
I use Linux.
I wish so bad that it didn't suck. But it does. it is stable. More stable then Microsoft could ever imagine. But thats because of the programs written for it, as much as it is for the OS itself.
And the dude who said it did about as much as your c64?
Haha. You're not far off, but then so does windows.
Linux is just to badly organised for my liking. Something is wrong with it, I'm just not sure what.
" Linux is like a semen sandwich. Supposed to be good for you, but it tastes like sh1t "
Quote:
Hey kaiyin
You said that ATA100 is working now, but how can you tell?
I have an ATA100 Maxtor 30gig on my Abit KT7-A Raid and it still runs slower than my main disk which is UDMA 66.
I tried running HD Tach and Sisoft Sandra and they both reported it being damned slow.
In the RAID Array setup, its selected as UDMA Mode 5.
..... %< ~snip~
Homer
If it's on your RAID array, it should be using the Highpoint drivers and therefore Windows treats it as SCSI, not IDE. If you are not using the Highpoint drivers, you damn well should be. Since it's SCSI, the ATA100 patch from Microsoft has absolutely zero effect since it will already be running at ATA100
--
Xiven
Hey kaiyin
You said that ATA100 is working now, but how can you tell?
I have an ATA100 Maxtor 30gig on my Abit KT7-A Raid and it still runs slower than my main disk which is UDMA 66.
I tried running HD Tach and Sisoft Sandra and they both reported it being damned slow.
In the RAID Array setup, its selected as UDMA Mode 5.
..... %< ~snip~
Homer
If it's on your RAID array, it should be using the Highpoint drivers and therefore Windows treats it as SCSI, not IDE. If you are not using the Highpoint drivers, you damn well should be. Since it's SCSI, the ATA100 patch from Microsoft has absolutely zero effect since it will already be running at ATA100
--
Xiven