windows 9x/me or windows 2k sp2?

what's better?

Legacy OS 455 This topic was started by ,


data/avatar/default/avatar39.webp

120 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-08-21
what's better?

Participate on our website and join the conversation

You have already an account on our website? Use the link below to login.
Login
Create a new user account. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds.
Register
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.

Responses to this topic


data/avatar/default/avatar33.webp

723 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-02-05
Depends for what...
 
9x is simple and perfect for games and such.
ME it's simply weird...should have been skipped Nah, I guess it's ok...for most purposes...OEMs thrive on it.
 
NT is old, with SP6 still encountered on many corporate machines
2000 with SP2 is the best choice from all above, games work ok and you cannot compare the NT kernel with the 9x one.

data/avatar/default/avatar15.webp

1047 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-04-17
Technically you can compare the NT kernel with the 9x one The NT Kernel is stable, well performing, and efficient at handling multiple tasks. The 9x kernel has strong compatibility but thats it and this is due to it allowing direct hardware access.
 
If you use Windows 98/ME it would be for mostly gaming, email checking and MS Word. But Windows 2000 can do this too and it would be stable. Only if you have an older PC with 128 Megs of RAM and less than 500 Mhz I would go the 9x route.
 
Forget Windows NT4, its dead now as is 95. In fact I would say Windows 98 is near death too, MS won't allow future DirectX releases to work on 98 anymore so it will kill 98 as a gaming platform. They did it to 95 with Direct X 8.1, I am betting Direct X 9.1 won't be 98 friendly.