WinRoute Pro 4.2.2 alongside NT4 Router-to-Router VPN?
This is a discussion about WinRoute Pro 4.2.2 alongside NT4 Router-to-Router VPN? in the Windows Networking category; Hi, Is anyone running NT4 Server with WinRoute Pro installed on the same machine as RRAS, supporting a Router-to-Router VPN with a Win2K server? Client to NT4 Server VPN works no problem with WinRoute Pro service running.
Hi,
Is anyone running NT4 Server with WinRoute Pro installed on the same machine as RRAS, supporting a Router-to-Router VPN with a Win2K server?
Client to NT4 Server VPN works no problem with WinRoute Pro service running.
Router-to-Router (Win2K to NT4) VPN works no problem as long as WinRoute Service is stopped. As soon as WinRoute service is started WinRoute intercepts the taffic and is discarding them according to Debug log.
WinRoute is set to exclude the server from NAT on the RAS interface.
The Winroute log keeps saying "NAT out failed, pkt id=xxxxxx".
If anyone is running a similar setup successfully I would be extremely grateful to hear of any tips or ideas.
Rol.
Is anyone running NT4 Server with WinRoute Pro installed on the same machine as RRAS, supporting a Router-to-Router VPN with a Win2K server?
Client to NT4 Server VPN works no problem with WinRoute Pro service running.
Router-to-Router (Win2K to NT4) VPN works no problem as long as WinRoute Service is stopped. As soon as WinRoute service is started WinRoute intercepts the taffic and is discarding them according to Debug log.
WinRoute is set to exclude the server from NAT on the RAS interface.
The Winroute log keeps saying "NAT out failed, pkt id=xxxxxx".
If anyone is running a similar setup successfully I would be extremely grateful to hear of any tips or ideas.
Rol.
Participate in our website and join the conversation
This subject has been archived. New comments and votes cannot be submitted.
Nov 23
Nov 25
0
1 minute
Responses to this topic

OP
Solved it - Kerio's solution to the problem is to cheat and not use a Router-to-Router config but two VPNs in client-server config. Not elegant, but it works i guess!. :x